From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
<laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
<izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>, Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-sysfs: replace mutex_lock with mutex_trylock to avoid potential deadlock situation
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:38:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51062ADA.6080903@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVV20XktXTfQ2OKQeprL1V2rGORpUf8VBOyDB4Y+VOCNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,
I have worked out a draft patch set to serialize hotplug operations,
but encountered some obstacles when dealing with PCI root buses. I will
try to rebase the patch set onto "PCI: Iterate pci host bridge instead of
pci root bus" from Yinghai. And also need to fix bugs reported by Lin Feng
too.
Regards!
Gerry
On 2013-1-26 4:59, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>
>> If we're going to fix the sysfs deadlock (and we should), I want to
>> either see an argument for why we don't have a problem outside of
>> sysfs, or I want to fix sysfs and non-sysfs at the same time.
>
> Sure.
>
> Jiang should have one patches to address that?
>
> Yinghai
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-28 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-27 7:42 [PATCH] pci-sysfs: replace mutex_lock with mutex_trylock to avoid potential deadlock situation Lin Feng
2013-01-03 1:47 ` Lin Feng
2013-01-24 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-25 10:02 ` Gu Zheng
2013-01-25 17:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-25 18:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-25 20:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-25 20:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 7:38 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51062ADA.6080903@huawei.com \
--to=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).