linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	tangchen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev()
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:39:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174A2CB.4090606@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo7yPUTOPYsPkhKTpe2yxbo_XN4Y4iBesVLudAmbuRsJ+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bjorn,
   Sorry for the later reply!

On 04/20/2013 01:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> From 906167d9a09babbe189f62944ecb8c0b198a0f64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:12:32 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Introduce  pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev()
>>
>> Now here we introduce a new struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus) to replace alloc_pci_dev().
>> It take a "struct pci_bus *" argument, so we can alloc a pci device on a target pci bus, and it acquire
>> the reference of the pci_bus.
>> Since the old alloc_pci_dev() is exported, so we still keep it for a while but mark it as __deprecated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/linux/pci.h |    4 +++-
>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index b494066..5233fb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static void pci_release_bus_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
>>         kfree(bridge);
>>  }
>>
>> -struct pci_dev *alloc_pci_dev(void)
>> +struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>>         struct pci_dev *dev;
>>
>> @@ -1209,6 +1209,25 @@ struct pci_dev *alloc_pci_dev(void)
>>
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->bus_list);
>>
>> +       if (bus) {
>> +               get_device(&bus->dev);
>> +               dev->bus = bus;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return dev;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_dev);
>> +
>> +__deprecated struct pci_dev *alloc_pci_dev(void)
> 
> I don't think there's any point in marking the function *definition*
> as deprecated; it only makes sense for the declaration in the header
> file, so callers of the function will generate warnings.

Thanks for your explaining, I'll fix it in the right way.

> 
>> +{
>> +       struct pci_dev *dev;
>> +       printk(KERN_DEBUG "alloc_pci_dev is deprecated, please use pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *) instead!\n");
> 
> I don't want to print a message at run-time, because users will see
> the message and complain about it, but they can't do anything about
> it.  And neither can we, because it will only be out-of-tree modules
> that call alloc_pci_dev().  The build-time warning is all we can do.

Yeah, it seems useless here. I'll remove it. 
 

> 
>> +       dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pci_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!dev)
>> +               return NULL;
>> +
>> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->bus_list);
> 
> Can't you implement this as simply:
> 
>     return pci_alloc_dev(NULL);

Agree, it can simplify the code, and make the later removal of the old alloc_pci_dev() smoothly.

> 
>> +
>>         return dev;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pci_dev);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 710067f..682de2b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -348,7 +348,9 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_physfn(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>         return dev;
>>  }
>>
>> -extern struct pci_dev *alloc_pci_dev(void);
>> +extern struct pci_dev *pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus *bus);
>> +
>> +extern __deprecated struct pci_dev *alloc_pci_dev(void);
>>
>>  #define        to_pci_dev(n) container_of(n, struct pci_dev, dev)
>>  #define for_each_pci_dev(d) while ((d = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, d)) != NULL)
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-18  9:00 [PATCH 2/3] PCI: rename alloc_pci_dev() to pci_alloc_dev() Gu Zheng
2013-04-18 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-19  5:35   ` Gu Zheng
2013-04-19  9:44   ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev() Gu Zheng
2013-04-19 17:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-20  2:58       ` Mike Qiu
2013-04-22  2:40         ` Gu Zheng
2013-04-22  2:39       ` Gu Zheng [this message]
2013-04-19  9:45   ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus) instead Gu Zheng
2013-04-19 17:35     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-22  3:14       ` Gu Zheng
2013-04-23  7:29   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev() Gu Zheng
2013-04-23  7:29   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus) instead Gu Zheng
2013-04-23 16:44     ` Jiang Liu
2013-04-24  3:16       ` Gu Zheng
2013-04-23 17:34     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-24  4:06       ` Gu Zheng
2013-04-30 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev() Gu Zheng
2013-04-30 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: introduce pci_bus_get()/pci_bus_put() to hide pci_bus' reference management Gu Zheng
2013-04-30 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus) instead Gu Zheng
2013-04-30 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Check if the pci device get removed from pci tree already in remove_callback() Gu Zheng
2013-05-08 22:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-09  2:23       ` Gu Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5174A2CB.4090606@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).