linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Jiang <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:46:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51923232.2010304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034672.tljvClO7po@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 05/14/2013 07:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:08:30 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> index 91ddfd6..9ced5c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> @@ -379,23 +379,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>   	u32 flags, base_flags;
>>   	bool is_osc_granted = false;
>> +	acpi_handle hdl = device->handle;
> The usual way is to call it 'handle'.  Any reason why not to do it here
Hi Rafael,
     Just to avoid splitting some code into two lines, I could to use 
"handle"
if preferred.
>>   	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	if (!root)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>>   	segment = 0;
>> -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>> -				       &segment);
>> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, &segment);
>>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>> +		acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>   		result = -ENODEV;
>>   		goto end;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>>   	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>> -	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
>> +	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(hdl, &root->secondary);
>>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>   		/*
>>   		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
>> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>>   		 */
>>   		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
>> -		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>> -		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>> +		acpi_handle_warn(hdl,
>> +				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>> +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>>   					       NULL, &bus);
>>   		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>   			root->secondary.start = bus;
>>   		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>>   			root->secondary.start = 0;
>>   		else {
>> -			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>> +			acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>>   			result = -ENODEV;
>>   			goto end;
>>   		}
>> @@ -425,11 +425,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>>   	device->driver_data = root;
>>   
>> -	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>> +	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>>   	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>>   	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
>>   
>> -	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
>> +	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(hdl);
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
>> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   		dev_info(&device->dev,
>>   			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>>   
>> -		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
>> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(hdl, &flags,
>>   				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>>   		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>>   			is_osc_granted = true;
>> @@ -505,9 +505,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   	 */
>>   	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>>   	if (!root->bus) {
>> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
>> -			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>> -			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>> +		acpi_handle_err(hdl,
>> +			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>> +			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>>   		result = -ENODEV;
>>   		goto end;
>>   	}
>> @@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>   		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>>   			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>>   	} else {
>> -		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
>> -			"disabling ASPM\n");
>> +		acpi_handle_info(hdl,
>> +			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>>   		pcie_no_aspm();
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -571,12 +571,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>>   	struct acpi_device *device;
>>   
>>   	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +				   "acpi device exists...\n");
> Do we have acpi_handle_dbg()?  If so, why don't you use it here? (And below.)
> If not, why don't you add it and use it here (and below)?
acpi_handle_dbg() only generates message if CONFIG_DEBUG is enabled,
so use pci_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, xxx) to keep original behavior.
Thanks,
Gerry
>
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
>> -		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>> @@ -602,7 +603,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>>   static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>   {
>>   	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>>   	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>>   	acpi_handle handle;
>>   	u32 type;
>> @@ -613,13 +613,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>   
>>   	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>>   
>> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>> -
>>   	switch (type) {
>>   	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>>   		/* bus enumerate */
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>   		if (!root)
>>   			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>   
>> @@ -627,27 +625,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>   
>>   	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>>   		/* device check */
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>   		if (!root)
>>   			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>   		break;
>>   
>>   	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>>   		/* request device eject */
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>   		if (root)
>>   			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>>   		break;
>>   	default:
>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
>> -				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>> +			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%xn", type);
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
>> -	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
>> @@ -661,9 +658,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>>   find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>   {
>>   	acpi_status status;
>> -	char objname[64];
>> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
>> -				      .pointer = objname };
>>   	int *count = (int *)context;
>>   
>>   	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
>> @@ -671,16 +665,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>   
>>   	(*count)++;
>>   
>> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>> -
>>   	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>>   					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>> -				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>> +			 (unsigned int)status);
>>   	else
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
>> -				 objname);
>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> +				   "notify handler is installed\n");
>>   
>>   	return AE_OK;
>>   }
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-14 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13 16:08 [PATCH v2, part 1 0/9] Prepare for introducing PCI bus lock interfaces Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 1/9] PCI: introduce pci_bus_{get|put}() to manage PCI bus reference count Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 2/9] PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev() Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 3/9] PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus) instead Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 17:23   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14  8:26     ` Gu Zheng
2013-05-14 14:59       ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-14 15:10         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14 16:57           ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-14 18:52             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-15 14:39               ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-15 14:43                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-15 14:46                   ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-15 14:58                     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-15 21:32                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-15 21:52                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-15 21:29                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-15 23:46                       ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 4/9] PCI: mark pci_scan_bus_parented() as __deprecated Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 5/9] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 23:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-14 12:41     ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-14 13:01       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 23:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-14 12:46     ` Liu Jiang [this message]
2013-05-14  8:43   ` Gu Zheng
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 7/9] PCI, IA64: minor code clean up Jiang Liu
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 8/9] PCI: make PCI host bridge/bus creating and destroying logic symmetric Jiang Liu
2013-05-20  6:35   ` Gu Zheng
2013-05-20 15:52     ` Liu Jiang
2013-05-13 16:08 ` [PATCH v2, part 1 9/9] PCI, unicore, m68k: remove redundant call of pci_bus_add_devices() Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51923232.2010304@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).