From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:52934 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758866Ab3EOOvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 10:51:19 -0400 Message-ID: <5193A0E1.4000307@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:51:13 +0800 From: Liu Jiang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: Bjorn Helgaas , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Gu Zheng , Toshi Kani , Myron Stowe , Yijing Wang , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2, part 2 01/18] PCI: introduce hotplug-safe PCI bus iterators References: <1368550322-1045-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <20130514170528.GA4030@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20130514170528.GA4030@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/15/2013 01:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:51:45AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_exists); > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? Same for the other new exports? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi Greg, Only pci_root_buses from drivers/pci/search.c is exported as GPL, all other functions from that file are exported as EXPORT_SYMBOL(). So should we keep those new interfaces as EXPORT_SYMBOL() too? Thanks, Gerry