linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, ddutile@redhat.com,
	bill.sumner@hp.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Reset PCIe devices to stop ongoing DMA
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:44:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B93221.2040505@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5u8qGALt6C+tuPYXdd2YgyMH6fnPnA+afUteEZ7kY0iw@mail.gmail.com>

(2013/06/12 13:45), Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Vivek, Haren; sorry I didn't think to add you earlier]
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Takao Indoh
> <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> (2013/06/11 11:20), Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 
>>> I'm not sure you need to reset legacy devices (or non-PCI devices)
>>> yet, but the current hook isn't anchored anywhere -- it's just an
>>> fs_initcall() that doesn't give the reader any clue about the
>>> connection between the reset and the problem it's solving.
>>>
>>> If we do something like this patch, I think it needs to be done at the
>>> point where we enable or disable the IOMMU.  That way, it's connected
>>> to the important event, and there's a clue about how to make
>>> corresponding fixes for other IOMMUs.
>>
>> Ok. pci_iommu_init() is appropriate place to add this hook?
> 
> I looked at various IOMMU init places today, and it's far more
> complicated and varied than I had hoped.
> 
> This reset scheme depends on enumerating PCI devices before we
> initialize the IOMMU used by those devices.  x86 works that way today,
> but not all architectures do (see the sparc pci_fire_pbm_init(), for

Sorry, could you tell me which part depends on architecture?

> example).  And I think conceptually, the IOMMU should be enumerated
> and initialized *before* the devices that use it.
> 
> So I'm uncomfortable with that aspect of this scheme.
> 
> It would be at least conceivable to reset the devices in the system
> kernel, before the kexec.  I know we want to do as little as possible
> in the crashing kernel, but it's at least a possibility, and it might
> be cleaner.

I bet this will be not accepted by kdump maintainer. Everything in panic
kernel is unreliable.

Thanks,
Takao Indoh


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-14  5:29 [PATCH v2] PCI: Reset PCIe devices to stop ongoing DMA Takao Indoh
2013-05-14 22:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-21 23:46   ` Takao Indoh
2013-06-06  7:25 ` Takao Indoh
2013-06-07  4:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-07  8:46   ` Takao Indoh
2013-06-11  2:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-11  6:08       ` Takao Indoh
2013-06-11 23:19         ` Sumner, William
2013-06-12  0:53           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-12 13:19           ` Don Dutile
2013-06-13  3:25             ` Takao Indoh
2013-06-12  4:45         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-13  2:44           ` Takao Indoh [this message]
2013-06-13  3:41             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-14  2:11               ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-24  6:29                 ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-25 14:24                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-29  0:20                     ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-25 17:00                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-29  0:37                     ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-29 14:17                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-30  6:09                         ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-30 15:59                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31  0:35                             ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-31  3:11                               ` Alex Williamson
2013-07-31  5:50                                 ` Takao Indoh
2013-07-31 21:08                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31 21:23                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-01  6:34                                   ` Takao Indoh
2013-08-01 12:42                                     ` Alex Williamson
2013-08-01 13:20                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-31 19:56                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-31 16:09                     ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B93221.2040505@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bill.sumner@hp.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).