From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:50210 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752112Ab3HEHTQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 03:19:16 -0400 Message-ID: <51FF51EB.9070907@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:19:07 +0800 From: Zhenzhong Duan Reply-To: zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , xen-devel , Feng Jin , Sucheta Chakraborty Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor msi/msix restore code Part2 References: <51EF451A.8050003@oracle.com> <20130801151616.GE21528@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> <51FB78D1.6060802@oracle.com> <20130802120101.GE24540@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20130802120101.GE24540@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013-08-02 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> Konrad, are you OK with this patch now? >>> Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal >>> was not altered. >>> >>> And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it >>> would be good to confirm this via testing just in case. >> I had ever let our customer test on baremetal and it passed. > Are they OK with being credited for this in the patch? Meaning are they > OK with Reported-by-and-Tested-by: flag? sucheta.chakraborty from Qlogic also reproduced the same and I got his confirm patch worked. Already add him in tested-by. zduan > > Either way, I think the only remaining issue is to expand the git commit > a bit to include the discussion about the flow of the pci_read/pci_write > and point out that the logic remains the same. > > >> zduan