From: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linux.com>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
Subject: Re: acpiphp and pciehp not working together on Thinkpad X200s
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:34:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520954EA.2060308@message-id.googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo6HThAr7MXX1-qpzryy7=F7+eMfNK_zWuP9j5arLb1RXA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bjorn,
Am 12.08.2013 19:21, schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
> Thanks for the report, Stefan. I opened
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 so we don't forget
> about this. If you could attach complete dmesg logs for both cases
> (working and failing) to that bugzilla, that would be great. An
> acpidump might also be interesting, since the ACPI namespace
> determines what acpiphp does.
Ok, I added all that information to the bug.
> I suspect that we're being too aggressive about determining when we
> should use one or the other of acpiphp and pciehp. We basically
> decide up front which one we expect the platform to use, and we only
> listen to signals from that one. But I wonder if we should just
> prepare for signals from both.
Actually I booted an older Kernel (3.7.10, openSUSE 12.3 kernel) which
has both drivers configured as modules.
The interesting thing is: I was not able to load acpiphp there, it
errored out with ENODEV.
So maybe something changed, making acpiphp more (too?) relaxed.
Should I try building the latest kernel with both drivers as modules to
see if this makes a difference?
Best regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Seyfried
Linux Consultant & Developer -- GPG Key: 0x731B665B
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 8:13 acpiphp and pciehp not working together on Thinkpad X200s Stefan Seyfried
2013-08-11 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-11 21:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2013-08-11 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-12 17:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-12 21:34 ` Stefan Seyfried [this message]
2013-08-12 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-12 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-13 9:50 ` Stefan Seyfried
2013-08-13 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520954EA.2060308@message-id.googlemail.com \
--to=stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox