From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:19:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5209FA05.6090702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BA285A30-3E38-4F7A-BD5E-3271AD1A46BE@codeaurora.org>
[Added DT maintainers directly for a question below]
On 08/13/13 02:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
>> This patch adds a check for DT passed reset-gpios property and deasserts/
>> asserts reset pin on probe/remove with configurable delay. Corresponding
>> binding documentation is also updated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
[...]
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
>> index 638673a..f2fa261 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt
>> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ and the following optional properties:
>> - marvell,pcie-lane: the physical PCIe lane number, for ports having
>> multiple lanes. If this property is not found, we assume that the
>> value is 0.
>> +- reset-gpios: optional gpio to PERST#
>> +- reset-delay-ms: delay in ms to wait after reset de-assertion
>
> Both of these should probably be marvell,reset...
Kumar,
as Thomas already mentioned, non-prefixed "foo-gpios" are quite common.
As reset gpios are likely to be common among SoC pci controller setups,
I though I'd stick with the non-prefixed property. But I have no strong
opinion about it - but let's see how DT jurisdiction will vote :)
> Does reset-delay-ms vary per board? I can't remember where the
discussion got to about configuration info.
Hmm, for Dove SoC, I only have one board to test - but the driver
currently is for 4 different SoCs. I just did some quick evaluation
of the reset delay required to bring up the device on the D3Plug.
Using 10ms was too short, 20ms worked.
I guess there will be other SoC/boards requiring different delays
but I am fine with hardcoded 20ms and re-introduce reset-delay property
only if it is really required. The driver's default is 20ms anyway.
>>
>> Example:
>
> It's usually good to update example to show all optional properties.
Ok, will add the properties to one of the example ports.
Thanks,
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 18:46 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: mvebu: move clock enable before register access Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 7:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 9:22 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 7:58 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 7:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 9:23 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: mvebu: remove subsys_initcall Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 7:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 8:06 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 9:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 0:56 ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-13 9:19 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2013-08-13 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 8:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 9:59 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-08-13 10:03 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 10:40 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 10:59 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] PCI: mvebu: add support for Marvell Dove SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5209FA05.6090702@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).