From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<dougthompson@xmission.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<jbeulich@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AMD64_EDAC: Fix incorrect wrap arounds due to left shift beyond 32 bits.
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:07:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217EB44.3020302@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823213725.GC15521@pd.tnic>
On 8/23/2013 4:37 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:27:52PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>> Link to the bug report:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=137692201732220&w=2
>>
>> dct_base and dct_limit obtain 32 bit register values when they read their
>> respective pci config space registers. A left shift beyond 32 bits will
>> cause them to wrap around. Similar case for chan_addr as can be seen from
>> the bug report. In the patch, we rectify this by casting chan_addr to u64
>> and by comparing dct_base and dct_limit against (sys_addr >> 27)
>>
>> Tested on F15h, M30h with ECC turned on and works fine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> index b86228c..eb4793e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> @@ -1558,11 +1558,12 @@ static int f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
>> }
>>
>> /* Verify sys_addr is within DCT Range. */
>> - dct_base = (dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt) << 27);
>> - dct_limit = (((dct_cont_limit_reg >> 11) & 0x1FFF) << 27) | 0x7FFFFFF;
>> + dct_base = dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt);
> This can't be correct.
>
> So the original patch takes the shifted dct_base while your change
> doesn't anymore...
>
>> + dct_limit = (dct_cont_limit_reg >> 11) & 0x1FFF;
>>
>> if (!(dct_cont_base_reg & BIT(0)) &&
>> - !(dct_base <= sys_addr && dct_limit >= sys_addr))
>> + !(dct_base <= (sys_addr >> 27) &&
>> + dct_limit >= (sys_addr >> 27)))
> ... and while this comparison shifts sys_addr to use the proper bits,
> the code does this assignment later:
>
> chan_offset = dct_base;
>
> Now, chan_offset has the << 27 version of dct_base which makes the following
> calculation wrong:
>
> chan_addr = sys_addr - chan_offset;
Oops. my apologies.
> because sys_addr is the full 64-bit, unshifted value.
>
> The right thing to do would be to do:
>
> chan_offset = dct_base << 27;
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
No, you are right.
I am re-sending the patch.
Thanks,
-Aravind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 0:27 [PATCH 0/1] AMD64_EDAC: Fix incorrect wrap arounds due to left shift beyond 32 bits Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2013-08-20 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2013-08-23 21:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-23 23:07 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2013-08-20 6:53 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5217EB44.3020302@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).