From: Valentine <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: rcar: fix bridge logic configuration accesses
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:13:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E8C64B.8060307@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140129064234.GG23833@verge.net.au>
On 01/29/2014 10:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:41:29PM +0400, Valentine wrote:
>> On 01/28/2014 02:06 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> The bridge logic at slot 0 only supports reads up to 0x40 and the
>>> rest of the PCI configuration space for this slot is marked as
>>> reserved in the manual.
>>>
>>> Trying a read from offset 0x100 is producing an error from the
>>> bridge. With error interrupts enabled, the following is printed:
>>
>> I don't think this is a critical error.
>> The bridge works fine after an attempt to access the unsupported PCIe/PCI-X 2 area.
>>
>> If you want to prevent the access, I'm OK with it.
>> But I think it's better to do "if (where <= 0x100)"
>> and drop the slot check since all other slots do not support
>> access beyond 0x100 as well.
>>
>> The PCI code attempts to access beyond 0x100 only once when probing PCI bridges
>> to see if they support PCIe/PCI-X 2 area which is 4K.
>> The area beyond 0x40 is never accessed because the bridge does not expose any PCI capabilities.
>>
>>>
>>> pci-rcar-gen2 ee0d0000.pci: error irq: status 00000014
>>
>> Did you experience any problems other than this message
>> printed by the IRQ handler introduced by the previous patch?
>
> I am wondering if the documentation for the r8a7790 and r8a7791 are
> the same with regards to the <= 0x100 limit.
>
It is the same since it is neither a PCIe nor a PCI-X 2 device.
Thanks,
Val.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> Cc: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
>>> index 01ba069..42f0105 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
>>> @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ static void __iomem *rcar_pci_cfg_base(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>>> if (slot > 2)
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> + /* bridge logic only has registers to 0x40 */
>>> + if (slot == 0x0 && where >= 0x40)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> val = slot ? RCAR_AHBPCI_WIN1_DEVICE | RCAR_AHBPCI_WIN_CTR_CFG :
>>> RCAR_AHBPCI_WIN1_HOST | RCAR_AHBPCI_WIN_CTR_CFG;
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Val.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 10:06 PCI fixes for Renesas RCar Ben Dooks
2014-01-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: rcar: check platform_get_irq() return code Ben Dooks
2014-01-28 20:19 ` Valentine
2014-01-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: rcar: add error interrupt handling Ben Dooks
2014-01-28 20:47 ` Valentine
2014-01-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: rcar: fix bridge logic configuration accesses Ben Dooks
2014-01-28 19:41 ` Valentine
2014-01-29 6:42 ` Simon Horman
2014-01-29 9:13 ` Valentine [this message]
2014-01-29 9:13 ` Ben Dooks
2014-01-29 9:17 ` Valentine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E8C64B.8060307@cogentembedded.com \
--to=valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).