From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:44791 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895AbaESPJ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 11:09:59 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s4JF9xeg011291 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:09:59 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4JF9xqX022294 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:09:59 -0500 Received: from [158.218.103.123] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4JF9wOw013109 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 10:09:58 -0500 Message-ID: <537A1EC6.30800@ti.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:09:58 -0400 From: Murali Karicheri MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: What is the right way to initialize the VendorID info of the RC's config space? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Keystone PCI controller's config space doesn't have the vendorID information set and s/w is expected to read this info from the SoC's register and update. Is adding a quirk for this the right thing to do? Murali