linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com>, <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	<jon.mason@intel.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: update device mps when doing pci hotplug
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:27:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D8663C.20203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406650687.1011.180.camel@ul30vt.home>

On 2014/7/30 0:18, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 16:17 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Currently we don't update device's mps value when doing
>> pci device hot-add. The hot-added device's mps will be set
>> to default value (128B). But the upstream port device's mps
>> may be larger than 128B which was set by firmware during
>> system bootup. In this case the new added device may not
>> work normally.
> 
> Apologies if we rehash some previously discussed topics while I try to
> cover for Bjorn while he's out.  By "normally", do you mean "optimally"?
> The device should be functional with a lower mps setting, right?

No, the device can not work, because some pcie tlp packets will be discarded.
Sorry for my poor English.
> 
>>  This issue was found in huawei 5885 server
>> and Dell R620 server. And if we run the platform with windows,
>> this problem is gone. This patch try to update the hot added
>> device mps equal to its parent mps, if device mpss < parent mps,
>> print warning.
>>
>> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60671
>> Reported-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
>> Reported-by: Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com
>> Reported-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index e3cf8a2..583ca52 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1613,6 +1613,44 @@ static void pcie_write_mrrs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  		dev_err(&dev->dev, "MRRS was unable to be configured with a safe value.  If problems are experienced, try running with pci=pcie_bus_safe\n");
>>  }
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * pcie_bus_update_set - update device mps when device doing hot-add
>> + * @dev: PCI device to set
>> + * 
>> + * After device hot add, mps will be set to default(128B), But the 
>> + * upstream port device's mps may be larger than 128B which was set 
>> + * by firmware during system bootup. Then we should update the device
>> + * mps to equal to its parent mps, Or the device can not work normally.
>> + */
>> +static void pcie_bus_update_set(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int mps, p_mps, mpss;
>> +	struct pci_dev *parent;
>> +
>> +	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) || !dev->bus->self 
>> +			|| !dev->bus->self->is_hotplug_bridge)
>> +		return;
>> +	
>> +	parent = dev->bus->self;
>> +	mps = pcie_get_mps(dev);
>> +	p_mps = pcie_get_mps(parent);
>> +
>> +	if (mps >= p_mps)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	mpss = 128 << dev->pcie_mpss;
>> +	if (mpss < p_mps) {
>> +		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MPSS %d smaller than upstream MPS %d\n"
>> +				"If necessary, use \"pci=pcie_bus_safe\" boot parameter to avoid this problem\n",
>> +				mpss, p_mps);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	pcie_write_mps(dev, p_mps);
>> +	dev_info(&dev->dev, "Max Payload Size set to %4d/%4d (was %4d)\n", 
>> +			pcie_get_mps(dev), 128 << dev->pcie_mpss, mps);
>> +}
> 
> So if the device mps is less than the parent mps and the device supports
> the parent mps, we update the device.  If the device cannot support the
> parent mps, warn.  Why do we bypass the opportunity to reduce the device
> mps if it exceeds the parent mps?

Exactly, the device's mps will never larger than its parent's. That's unexpected, so we leave it.

> 
>> +
>>  static void pcie_bus_detect_mps(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct pci_dev *bridge = dev->bus->self;
>> @@ -1637,6 +1675,7 @@ static int pcie_bus_configure_set(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	if (pcie_bus_config == PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF) {
>> +		pcie_bus_update_set(dev);
>>  		pcie_bus_detect_mps(dev);
>>  		return 0;
>>  	}
> 
> pcie_bus_update_set() and pcie_bus_detect_mps() have a lot of
> redundancy, can't we merge this new functionality into the existing
> function? 

OK, will do.

> Also, we're in the PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF branch, but we seem to
> be adding code which would imply PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE since we're
> bringing the device up to an optimal mps to match the parent.  Is there
> a simpler solution to simply downgrade the dev_warn in
> pcie_bus_detect_mps() to dev_info and change the text?  Thanks,

We just to adjust the device's mps to make the device can work, not for an
optimal mps.

> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-30  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-29  8:17 [PATCH] PCI: update device mps when doing pci hotplug Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 16:18 ` Alex Williamson
2014-07-29 16:30   ` Keith Busch
2014-07-29 16:42     ` Alex Williamson
2014-07-29 19:04       ` Keith Busch
2014-07-30  3:35       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  3:27   ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-07-30  3:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  3:42   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  3:58     ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  4:42       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  6:26 ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  6:57   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  7:17     ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  8:13       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  8:38         ` Ethan Zhao
2014-07-30  9:17           ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 19:41             ` Jordan_Hargrave
2014-09-03 19:20               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-03 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-04  6:12   ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-04 13:16     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-05  1:27       ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-05 14:37         ` Keith Busch
2014-09-24 22:41         ` Keith Busch
2014-09-24 23:30           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-25  1:23             ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-25 16:46               ` Keith Busch
2014-09-26  3:22                 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-02 15:31                   ` Jordan_Hargrave
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-29  8:23 Yijing Wang
2013-02-05  3:55 Yijing Wang
2013-05-28  3:15 ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-29 23:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-30  3:20     ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-30  3:42       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-30 22:29         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31  9:15           ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-31 17:53             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-31 20:42               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-01  1:23                 ` Yijing Wang
2013-08-01  1:21               ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D8663C.20203@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jordan_Hargrave@Dell.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=jon.mason@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).