From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/portdrv: Do not setup up IRQs if there are no users
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:47:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53a826fb-ece9-450d-e5fc-f145c2513688@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210820144532.GA25391@wunner.de>
On 20.08.21 16:45, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int pcie_device_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, int service, int irq)
>> */
>> int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> - int status, capabilities, i, nr_service;
>> + int status, capabilities, irq_services, i, nr_service;
>> int irqs[PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES];
>>
>> /* Enable PCI Express port device */
>> @@ -326,18 +326,32 @@ int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> return 0;
>>
>> pci_set_master(dev);
>> - /*
>> - * Initialize service irqs. Don't use service devices that
>> - * require interrupts if there is no way to generate them.
>> - * However, some drivers may have a polling mode (e.g. pciehp_poll_mode)
>> - * that can be used in the absence of irqs. Allow them to determine
>> - * if that is to be used.
>> - */
>> - status = pcie_init_service_irqs(dev, irqs, capabilities);
>> - if (status) {
>> - capabilities &= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>> - if (!capabilities)
>> - goto error_disable;
>> +
>> + irq_services = 0;
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_PME))
>> + irq_services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEAER))
>> + irq_services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
>> + irq_services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC))
>> + irq_services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC;
>> + irq_services &= capabilities;
>
> get_port_device_capability() would seem like a more natural place
> to put these checks.
>
> Note that your check for CONFIG_PCIEAER is superfluous due to
> the "#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER" in get_port_device_capability().
>
Not all service drivers need IRQs. That's why the test is separate. See
also the comment I shuffled around.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-20 13:52 [PATCH] PCI/portdrv: Do not setup up IRQs if there are no users Jan Kiszka
2021-08-20 14:45 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-08-20 14:47 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
[not found] <202108221525.NT2Kap5Q-lkp@intel.com>
2021-08-29 8:29 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53a826fb-ece9-450d-e5fc-f145c2513688@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).