From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: Austin.Bolen@dell.com, Shyam.Iyer@dell.com,
keith.busch@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Check for PCIe downtraining conditions
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:49:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54071f83-5d0d-04a0-d448-0c99ec0ffc4f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32d58835-2f35-0b80-38d0-b9ff603619dd@codeaurora.org>
On 05/31/2018 11:13 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 5/31/2018 12:01 PM, Alex G. wrote:
>>> PCI: Add pcie_print_link_status() to log link speed and whether it's limited
>> This one, I have, but it's not what I need. This looks at the available
>> bandwidth from root port to endpoint, whereas I'm only interested in
>> downtraining between endpoint and upstream port.
>
> I see what you are saying.
>
> With a little bit of effort, you can reuse the same code.
>
> Here is an attempt.
>
> You can probably extend pcie_bandwidth_available() to put an optional parent bridge
> device for your own use case and terminate the loop around here.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc7/source/drivers/pci/pci.c#L5182
>
> Then, you can use the existing code to achieve what you are looking for via
> pcie_print_link_status() by adding an optional parent parameter.
>
> bw_cap = pcie_bandwidth_capable(dev, &speed_cap, &width_cap);
> bw_avail = pcie_bandwidth_available(dev, &limiting_dev, &speed, &width, *parent*);
That's confusing. I'd expect _capable() and _available() to be
symmetrical. They either both look at one link only, or both go down to
the root port. Though it seems _capable() is link-local, and
_available() is down to root port.
>
> If parent parameter is NULL, code can walk all the way to root as it is doing today.
> If it is not, then will terminate the loop on the first iteration.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-31 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-31 15:05 [PATCH] PCI: Check for PCIe downtraining conditions Alexandru Gagniuc
2018-05-31 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 15:29 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2018-05-31 15:38 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 15:46 ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 15:54 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 16:01 ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 16:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 16:49 ` Alex G. [this message]
2018-05-31 16:50 ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 17:11 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 17:27 ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 21:52 ` Alex G.
2018-05-31 15:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-31 21:44 ` Alex G.
2018-06-01 13:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-06-02 17:42 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54071f83-5d0d-04a0-d448-0c99ec0ffc4f@gmail.com \
--to=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=Alex_Gagniuc@Dellteam.com \
--cc=Austin.Bolen@dell.com \
--cc=Shyam.Iyer@dell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).