From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <542773DD.8020105@huawei.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:35:09 +0800 From: Yijing Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Bjorn Helgaas , , , Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , , Russell King , , , , , Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , , Joerg Roedel , , , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , , , Sebastian Ott , "Tony Luck" , , "David S. Miller" , , Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Lucas Stach , David Vrabel , "Sergei Shtylyov" , Michael Ellerman , Thierry Reding , "Thomas Petazzoni" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/22] PCI/MSI: Introduce weak arch_find_msi_chip() to find MSI chip References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-7-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <5424D30A.6040900@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> MSI chip in this series is to setup MSI irq, including IRQ allocation, Map, >> compose MSI msg ..., in different platform, many arch specific MSI irq details in it. >> It's difficult to extract the common data and code. >> >> I have a plan to rework MSI related irq_chips in kernel, PCI and Non-PCI, currently, >> HPET, DMAR and PCI have their own irq_chip and MSI related functions, write_msi_msg(), >> mask_msi_irq(), etc... I want to extract the common data set for that, so we can >> remove lots of unnecessary MSI code. > > That makes sense. Can you please make sure that this does not conflict > with the ongoing work Jiang is doing in the x86 irq area with > hierarchical irqdomains to distangle layered levels like MSI from the > underlying vector/irqremap mechanics. Yes, I'm reviewing Jiang hierarchical irqdomains series, I'm interested in that changes. Thanks! Yijing. > > Thanks, > > tglx > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing