From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <55477B86.70705@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 22:00:38 +0800 From: Jiang Liu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amir Vadai CC: Thomas Gleixner , Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Ido Shamay , "David S. Miller" , Or Gerlitz , Eric Dumazet , Hadar Hen Zion , Eran Ben Elisha , Joe Perches , Saeed Mahameed , Matan Barak , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, netdev Subject: Re: [RFC v1 07/11] net/mlx4: Cache irq_desc->affinity instead of irq_desc References: <1430709339-29083-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1430709339-29083-8-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015/5/4 20:10, Amir Vadai wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: >> The field 'affinity' in irq_desc won't change once the irq_desc data >> structure is created. So cache irq_desc->affinity instead of irq_desc. >> This also helps to hide struct irq_desc from device drivers. > > Hi Jiang, > > I might not understand the new changes irq core, but up until now > affinity was changed when the user changed it through > /proc/irq//smp_affinity. > This code is monitoring the affinity from the napi_poll context to > detect affinity changes, and prevent napi from keep running on the > wrong CPU. > Therefore, the affinity can't be cached at the beginning. Please > revert this caching. Hi Amir, Thanks for review:) We want to hide irq_desc implementation details from device drivers, so made these changes. Function irq_get_affinity_mask() returns 'struct cpumask *' and we cache the returned pointer. On the other hand, user may change IRQ affinity through /proc/irq//smp_affinity, but that only changes the bitmap pointed to by the cached pointer and won't change the pointer itself. So it should always return the latest affinity setting by calling cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_curr, cq->irq_affinity). Or am I missing something here? Thanks! Gerry > > Thanks, > Amir >