From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <555975F2.9090208@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:17:38 +0800 From: Jiang Liu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Jason Cooper , Grant Likely , Kevin Cernekee , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP to guard irq_common_data.node References: <1430709339-29083-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1430709339-29083-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015/5/16 4:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > >> NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA >> to guard irq_common_data.node. > > Please move this change to the front and do it on irq_data. That would > have avoided confusing Abel :) Hi Thomas, Reordering these two patches will cause too much unnecessary code changes. so I will merge this patch into the patch to move node from struct irq_data into struct irq_common_data, which is more straight forward. Thanks! Gerry > > Thanks, > > tglx >