From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <5565F40C.8010004@amd.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:42:52 -0500 From: Suravee Suthikulanit MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , , CC: Ralf Baechle , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Michael Ellerman , Bjorn Helgaas , Richard Henderson , "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" , David Howells , Russell King , Tony Luck , "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Michal Simek , Koichi Yasutake , Chris Zankel , "Arnd Bergmann" , Krzysztof Halasa , Phil Edworthy , Jason Gunthorpe , Jingoo Han , "Lucas Stach" , Simon Horman , "Minghuan Lian" , Murali Karicheri , Tanmay Inamdar , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Thierry Reding , Thomas Petazzoni , Will Deacon , Jayachandran C Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] PCI: move pci_read_bridge_bases to the generic PCI layer References: <1432214067-2752-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1432214067-2752-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Lorenzo, Sorry for late reply. On 5/21/2015 8:14 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > When a PCI bus is scanned, upon PCI bridge detection the kernel > has to read the bridge registers to set-up its resources so that > the PCI resource hierarchy can be validated properly. > > Most if not all architectures read PCI bridge registers in the > pcibios_fixup_bus hook, that is called by the PCI generic layer > whenever a PCI bus is scanned. > > Since pci_read_bridge_bases is an arch agnostic operation (and it > is carried out on all architectures) it can be moved to the generic > PCI layer in order to consolidate code and remove the respective > calls from the architectures back-ends. > > The PCI_PROBE_ONLY flag is not checked before calling > pci_read_bridge_buses in the generic layer since reading the bridge > bases is not related to resources assignment; this implies that it > can be carried out safely on PCI_PROBE_ONLY systems too and should > not affect architectures (alpha, mips) that check the PCI_PROBE_ONLY > flag before reading the bridge bases. > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Cc: Ralf Baechle > Cc: James E.J. Bottomley > Cc: Michael Ellerman > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Richard Henderson > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > Cc: David Howells > Cc: Russell King > Cc: Tony Luck > Cc: David S. Miller > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Michal Simek > Cc: Koichi Yasutake > Cc: Chris Zankel > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c | 7 +------ > arch/frv/mb93090-mb00/pci-vdk.c | 2 -- > arch/ia64/pci/pci.c | 1 - > arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 9 +-------- > arch/mips/pci/pci.c | 6 ------ > arch/mn10300/unit-asb2305/pci.c | 1 - > arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 8 +------- > arch/x86/pci/common.c | 1 - > arch/xtensa/kernel/pci.c | 4 ---- > drivers/parisc/dino.c | 3 --- > drivers/parisc/lba_pci.c | 1 - > drivers/pci/probe.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 12 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > [.....] > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index 062fee6..335d9f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -453,7 +453,11 @@ void pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child) > struct resource *res; > int i; > > - if (pci_is_root_bus(child)) /* It's a host bus, nothing to read */ > + /* > + * If it is not a PCI bridge there is nothing to read > + */ > + if (pci_is_root_bus(child) || !dev || > + !((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI)) > return; > > dev_info(&dev->dev, "PCI bridge to %pR%s\n", > @@ -1878,6 +1882,11 @@ unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > * all PCI-to-PCI bridges on this bus. > */ > if (!bus->is_added) { > + /* > + * Read and initialize bridge resources. > + */ > + pci_read_bridge_bases(bus); > + > dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "fixups for bus\n"); > pcibios_fixup_bus(bus); > bus->is_added = 1; > So, I have tested the patch on ARM64 system w/ PROBE_ONLY mode, and noticed that we are calling pci_read_bridge_bases() after adding the devices on the slots. This is not soon enough since the downstream devices still failing to claim resources. However, do you think we can move pci_read_bridge_bases() before the pci_scan_slot() loop? Thanks, Suravee