From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:33406 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752643AbbFHIGk (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 04:06:40 -0400 Received: by wiwd19 with SMTP id d19so77027123wiw.0 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 01:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55754D06.9050201@monstr.eu> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:06:30 +0200 From: Michal Simek Reply-To: monstr@monstr.eu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] microblaze/PCI: Remove unused declarations References: <20150604214614.2399.5142.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20150604214929.2399.85988.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <55714AA3.1070407@monstr.eu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xD4GjdoCpLbSnTpnIaCGGsvFUdlcOKRP9" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xD4GjdoCpLbSnTpnIaCGGsvFUdlcOKRP9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/05/2015 05:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 06/04/2015 11:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> The following declarations were copied from powerpc but are unused on= >>> microblaze: >>> >>> struct pci_controller *init_phb_dynamic(struct device_node *dn) >>> int remove_phb_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) >>> struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node *node, ...) >>> void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct device_node *node, ...) >>> void of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus) >>> void of_rescan_bus(struct device_node *node, struct pci_bus *bus) >>> >>> Remove them. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas >>> CC: Michal Simek >>> --- >>> arch/microblaze/include/asm/pci.h | 12 ------------ >>> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Michal Simek >> >> Bjorn: Do you want me to take this via Microblaze tree? >=20 > Sure, it'd be great if you take all the Microblaze-specific patches. > There aren't any dependencies on them, so there shouldn't be any > problem. Ok. Added these 3 patches to microblaze next branch - it will be in linux-next tmr. >=20 > I do have a Microblaze hunk in "PCI: Remove unused > pci_dma_burst_advice()" and if you agree, I'll merge that one through > my tree since the change for each arch is essentially identical. No problem at all. Feel free to add there my acked-by line for microblaze= =2E Thanks, Michal --=20 Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform --xD4GjdoCpLbSnTpnIaCGGsvFUdlcOKRP9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlV1TQoACgkQykllyylKDCGjQACeKqvLqRFB8H/FjjmBmHU+IN09 AjIAn1jQXoGXwqL4OyVmlkjMnnZO6oz9 =aMAQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xD4GjdoCpLbSnTpnIaCGGsvFUdlcOKRP9--