From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Add pcie_downstream_port() (true for Root and Switch Downstream Ports)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:26:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A58C8F.4010703@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714194511.13471.8395.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On 7/14/2015 9:45 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> As used in the PCIe spec, "Downstream Port" includes both Root Ports and
> Switch Downstream Ports. We sometimes checked for PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM
> when we should have checked for PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT or
> PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM.
>
> For a Root Port without a slot, the effect of this was that using
> pcie_capability_read_word() to read PCI_EXP_SLTSTA returned zero instead of
> showing the Presence Detect State bit hardwired to one as the PCIe Spec,
> r3.0, sec 7.8, requires. (This read is completed in software because
> previous PCIe spec versions didn't require PCI_EXP_SLTSTA to exist at all.)
>
> Nothing in the kernel currently depends on this (pciehp only reads
> PCI_EXP_SLTSTA on ports with slots), so this is a cleanup and not a
> functional change.
>
> Add a pcie_downstream_port() helper function and use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
ACK
> ---
> drivers/pci/access.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
> index d9b64a1..79f0102 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/access.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
> @@ -531,6 +531,14 @@ static inline int pcie_cap_version(const struct pci_dev *dev)
> return pcie_caps_reg(dev) & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS;
> }
>
> +static bool pcie_downstream_port(constr struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> +
> + return type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> + type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM;
> +}
> +
> bool pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(const struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> @@ -546,10 +554,7 @@ bool pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(const struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> static inline bool pcie_cap_has_sltctl(const struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> -
> - return (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> - type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) &&
> + return pcie_downstream_port(dev) &&
> pcie_caps_reg(dev) & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT;
> }
>
> @@ -628,10 +633,9 @@ int pcie_capability_read_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, u16 *val)
> * State bit in the Slot Status register of Downstream Ports,
> * which must be hardwired to 1b. (PCIe Base Spec 3.0, sec 7.8)
> */
> - if (pci_is_pcie(dev) && pos == PCI_EXP_SLTSTA &&
> - pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
> + if (pci_is_pcie(dev) && pcie_downstream_port(dev) &&
> + pos == PCI_EXP_SLTSTA)
> *val = PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS;
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -657,10 +661,9 @@ int pcie_capability_read_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, u32 *val)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (pci_is_pcie(dev) && pos == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL &&
> - pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
> + if (pci_is_pcie(dev) && pcie_downstream_port(dev) &&
> + pos == PCI_EXP_SLTSTA)
> *val = PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS;
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 19:44 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Comment and PCIe capability accessor fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Fix pcie_port_device_resume() comment Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-14 22:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Add pcie_downstream_port() (true for Root and Switch Downstream Ports) Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-14 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A58C8F.4010703@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).