From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bl2on0070.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.70]:51499 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755294AbbGPRAr (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:00:47 -0400 Message-ID: <55A7E334.3030101@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:00:36 -0700 From: David Daney MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi CC: David Daney , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , "Jason Cooper" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Robert Richter , "David Daney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64, pci: Allow RC drivers to supply pcibios_add_device() implementation. References: <1436979285-8177-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1436979285-8177-4-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20150716090426.GA17097@red-moon> In-Reply-To: <20150716090426.GA17097@red-moon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/16/2015 02:04 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:54:43PM +0100, David Daney wrote: >> From: David Daney >> [...] >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> index 4095379..3356023 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> @@ -38,11 +38,21 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, >> return res->start; >> } >> >> +static int (*pcibios_add_device_impl)(struct pci_dev *); >> + >> +void set_pcibios_add_device(int (*arg)(struct pci_dev *)) >> +{ >> + pcibios_add_device_impl = arg; >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device >> */ >> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) >> { >> + if (pcibios_add_device_impl) >> + return pcibios_add_device_impl(dev); > > I am totally against this (and to be honest by reading the other > patches I failed to understand why you even need it), see above. > It is because ... > Thanks, > Lorenzo > >> + >> dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); ... this is total crap. But I didn't want to break existing systems. The PCI RC drivers need a way to configure the legacy virtual-wire interrupts, because the existing code doesn't do it. David Daney