linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Use a local mutex instead of pci_bus_sem to avoid deadlock
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:52:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A86DD9.60305@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo78rQW0LE8gVyHiZst4FC_m1B4ts2zf-vX5zr+4CQK+=A@mail.gmail.com>

>>> It looks to me like the loop in pci_setup_device() is unsafe to begin
>>> with.  But the obvious thing to do would be to add
>>> down_read(&pci_bus_sem) there, and then you'd need a down_write() in
>>> pci_slot_release(), so you're back where we started.
>>
>> I got it, I missed the bus->slots list traverse in pci scan code,
>> What about moving the bus->slots loop code from pci_setup_device() to drivers/pci/slot.c, and add a pci_slot_mutex to protect it ?
>> I think we should avoid to use pci_bus_sem to protect bus->slots list.
> 
> Seems better, although it's starting to feel a bit ad hoc.  We would
> need to write down this locking rule somewhere, e.g., near the struct
> pci_bus declaration.

OK, I will post a updated patch.

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
>> Something like this:
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index cefd636..6f00273 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1149,10 +1149,7 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>         dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
>>         set_pcie_port_type(dev);
>>
>> -       list_for_each_entry(slot, &dev->bus->slots, list)
>> -               if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
>> -                       dev->slot = slot;
>> -
>> +       pci_dev_assign_slot(dev);
>>         /* Assume 32-bit PCI; let 64-bit PCI cards (which are far rarer)
>>            set this higher, assuming the system even supports it.  */
>>         dev->dma_mask = 0xffffffff;
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c
>> index a9079d9..cf259e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c
>> @@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ static ssize_t cur_speed_read_file(struct pci_slot *slot, char *buf)
>>         return bus_speed_read(slot->bus->cur_bus_speed, buf);
>>  }
>>
>> +void pci_dev_assign_slot(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +       mutex_lock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>> +       list_for_each_entry(slot, &dev->bus->slots, list)
>> +               if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->number)
>> +                       dev->slot = slot;
>> +       mutex_unlock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>>  {
>>         struct pci_dev *dev;
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -195,7 +198,7 @@ static struct pci_slot *get_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr)
>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>         struct pci_slot *slot;
>>>>>>>>         /*
>>>>>>>> -        * We already hold pci_bus_sem so don't worry
>>>>>>>> +        * We already hold pci_slot_mutex so don't worry
>>>>>>>>          */
>>>>>>>>         list_for_each_entry(slot, &parent->slots, list)
>>>>>>>>                 if (slot->number == slot_nr) {
>>>>>>>> @@ -253,7 +256,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr,
>>>>>>>>         int err = 0;
>>>>>>>>         char *slot_name = NULL;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -       down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>> +       mutex_lock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         if (slot_nr == -1)
>>>>>>>>                 goto placeholder;
>>>>>>>> @@ -301,16 +304,18 @@ placeholder:
>>>>>>>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&slot->list);
>>>>>>>>         list_add(&slot->list, &parent->slots);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +       down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>>         list_for_each_entry(dev, &parent->devices, bus_list)
>>>>>>>>                 if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot_nr)
>>>>>>>>                         dev->slot = slot;
>>>>>>>> +       up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         dev_dbg(&parent->dev, "dev %02x, created physical slot %s\n",
>>>>>>>>                 slot_nr, pci_slot_name(slot));
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  out:
>>>>>>>>         kfree(slot_name);
>>>>>>>> -       up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>> +       mutex_unlock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>>>>>>>>         return slot;
>>>>>>>>  err:
>>>>>>>>         kfree(slot);
>>>>>>>> @@ -332,9 +337,9 @@ void pci_destroy_slot(struct pci_slot *slot)
>>>>>>>>         dev_dbg(&slot->bus->dev, "dev %02x, dec refcount to %d\n",
>>>>>>>>                 slot->number, atomic_read(&slot->kobj.kref.refcount) - 1);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -       down_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>> +       mutex_lock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>>>>>>>>         kobject_put(&slot->kobj);
>>>>>>>> -       up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>>>>>>>> +       mutex_unlock(&pci_slot_mutex);
>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_destroy_slot);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Yijing
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Yijing
>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing
>>
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-17  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 11:12 [PATCH] PCI: Use a local mutex instead of pci_bus_sem to avoid deadlock Yijing Wang
2015-06-12  8:20 ` Yijing Wang
2015-06-12 18:13   ` Rajat Jain
2015-06-12 18:19     ` Rajat Jain
     [not found]   ` <CAA93t1ooSY2keDigmUPpO7LzvT12YwQjpxH0b1xA508LL+VWdg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-12 18:20     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-15  0:40       ` Yijing Wang
2015-06-27  3:05       ` Yijing Wang
2015-06-27  3:19         ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-27  3:37           ` Yijing Wang
2015-07-16  4:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-16  7:55   ` Yijing Wang
2015-07-16 15:25     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17  1:14       ` Yijing Wang
2015-07-17  1:35         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17  1:54           ` Yijing Wang
2015-07-17  2:05             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17  2:24               ` Yijing Wang
2015-07-17  2:46                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17  2:52                   ` Yijing Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A86DD9.60305@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).