linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:52:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <562AD631.3040603@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445591396-95395-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>

On 10/23/2015 02:09 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> PCI-2.2 VPD entries have a maximum size of 32k, but might actually
> be smaller than that. To figure out the actual size one has to read
> the VPD area until the 'end marker' is reached.
> Trying to read VPD data beyond that marker results in 'interesting'
> effects, from simple read errors to crashing the card.
> This path modifies the attribute size to the avialable VPD size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/access.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
> index 6bc9b12..4f8208e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/access.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,34 @@ static int pci_vpd_f0_dev_check(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> +/**
> + * pci_vpd_size - determine actual size of Vital Product Data
> + * @dev:	pci device struct
> + * @old_size:	current assumed size, also maximum allowed size
> + *
> + */
> +size_t
> +pci_vpd_pci22_size(struct pci_dev *dev, size_t old_size)
> +{
> +	loff_t off = 0;
> +	unsigned char header[1+2];	/* 1 byte tag, 2 bytes length */
> +
> +	while (off < old_size && pci_read_vpd(dev, off, 1, header)) {
> +		if (header[0] == 0x78)	/* End tag descriptor */
> +			return off + 1;
> +		if (header[0] & 0x80) {
> +			/* Large Resource Data Type Tag */
> +			if (pci_read_vpd(dev, off+1, 2, &header[1]) != 2)
> +				return off + 1;
> +			off += 3 + ((header[2] << 8) | header[1]);
> +		} else {
> +			/* Short Resource Data Type Tag */
> +			off += 1 + (header[0] & 0x07);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return old_size;
> +}
> +

My understanding is that the end tag can have some data associated with 
it such as a checksum.  What you may want to look at doing is process 
long tag and short tag bits first.  Then you could do a mask and compare 
after and if ((header[0] & ~0x7) == 0x78) then you return off + 1.

Also I was wondering if you have looked at the cxgb4 network driver? 
They are using the vpd read/write calls to access their EEPROM and I 
assume they are doing so outside the actual VPD fields.

- Alex

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-24  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-23  9:09 [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-23 10:47 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 10:47 ` [RFC PATCH] pci: pci_vpd_pci22_size can be static kbuild test robot
2015-10-24  0:52 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2015-10-25  3:34   ` [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 17:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-11-25 18:01       ` Alexander Duyck
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-16 10:28 Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-16 10:41 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=562AD631.3040603@gmail.com \
    --to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).