From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bugfix] x86/PCI: Fix regression caused by commit 4d6b4e69a245 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas References: <1447648057-13644-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <20151124164907.GA24819@localhost> Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , x86@kernel.org, Keith Busch , Arthur Marsh From: Jiang Liu Message-ID: <56556D89.6020801@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:12:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015/11/25 6:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:27:37PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: >>> From: Liu Jiang >>> >>> Commit 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support >>> PCI host bridge") converted x86 to use the common interface >>> acpi_pci_root_create, but the conversion missed on code piece in >>> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c, which causes regression on some legacy >>> AMD platforms as reported by Arthur Marsh . >>> The root causes is that acpi_pci_root_create() fails to insert >>> host bridge resources into iomem_resource/ioport_resource because >>> x86_pci_root_bus_resources() has already inserted those resources. >>> So change x86_pci_root_bus_resources() to not insert resources into >>> iomem_resource/ioport_resource. >> >> Fixes: 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge") >> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu >>> Reported-and-tested-by: Arthur Marsh >> >> What's the status of this? It looks like a regression we need to fix >> for v4.4. >> >> AFAICT, Arthur did *not* test this patch (rather, his response says he >> did test it and the test failed). >> >> 4d6b4e69a245 was merged by Rafael, and I assume he'll merge the fix >> unless I hear otherwise. > > Quite frankly, I'm more likely to revert the offending commit at this > point as that's not the only regression reported against it and the > fix only helps in one case (out of three known to me). Hi Rafael, I got regression report from Hans de Bruin, Keith Busch , and Arthur Marsh . Hans and Keith also reports the patch fixes the regression. For Arthur's case, the debug patch works for him, but the formal patch based on the debug patch fails, so I need to do more investigation about this. Is there any other report related to commit 4d6b4e69a245 so I could help to investigate? Thanks, Gerry > > Thanks, > Rafael >