From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors
 against platfrom specific quirks.
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	<hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<okaya@codeaurora.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	<Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
References: <1452691267-32240-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
 <1452691267-32240-21-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
 <1452785776.28109.22.camel@redhat.com> <569CDD8F.807@semihalf.com>
CC: <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>, <mw@semihalf.com>,
	<Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>, <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	<Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>, <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
	<jcm@redhat.com>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
From: "liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <569D9634.3040304@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:49:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <569CDD8F.807@semihalf.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Tomasz, Mark

在 2016/1/18 20:41, Tomasz Nowicki 写道:
> On 14.01.2016 16:36, Mark Salter wrote:
>>> +extern struct pci_mcfg_fixup __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
>>> >+extern struct pci_mcfg_fixup __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
>>> >+
>>> >+static struct pci_ops *pci_mcfg_check_quirks(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>> >+{
>>> >+    struct pci_mcfg_fixup *f;
>>> >+    int bus_num = root->secondary.start;
>>> >+    int domain = root->segment;
>>> >+
>>> >+    /*
>>> >+     * First match against PCI topology <domain:bus> then use DMI or
>>> >+     * custom match handler.
>>> >+     */
>>> >+    for (f = __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f < __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f++) {
>>> >+        if ((f->domain == domain || f->domain == PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY) &&
>>> >+            (f->bus_num == bus_num || f->bus_num == PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY) &&
>>> >+            (f->system ? dmi_check_system(f->system) : 0 ||
>>> >+             f->match ? f->match(f, root) : 0))
>>> >+            return f->ops;
>> I think this would be better as:
>>
>>             (f->system ? dmi_check_system(f->system) : 1 &&
>>              f->match ? f->match(f, root) : 1))
>>             return f->ops;
>>
>> Otherwise, one has to call dmi_check_system() from f->match() if
>> access to root is needed.
>

Non-DMI, we need not to call dmi_check_system() from f->match(),
we can use _HID to decide to hook the pci_ops or not.

Device (PCI1)
{
         Name (_HID, "HISI0080") // PCI Express Root Bridge
         Name (_CID, "PNP0A03") // Compatible PCI Root Bridge
	...
}

static const struct acpi_device_id hisi_pcie_ids[] = {
     {"HISI0080", 0},
     {"", 0},
};

static int hisi_pcie_match(struct pci_mcfg_fixup *fixup, struct acpi_pci_root *root)
{
     int ret;
     struct acpi_device *device;

     device = root->device;
     ret = acpi_match_device_ids(device, hisi_pcie_ids);
     if (ret)
         return 0;
     ......
     return 1;
}

static struct pci_ops hisi_ecam_pci_ops = {
     .map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base,
     .read = hisi_pci_read,
     .write = hisi_pci_write,
};

DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(NULL, hisi_pcie_match, &hisi_ecam_pci_ops,
     PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);

Thanks
Dongdong
> Makes a lot of sense to me, I will modify as you suggested.
>
> Tomasz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>