linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:36:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AF4359.1020709@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454322357-10912-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On 2016/2/1 18:25, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The [0 - 64k] ACPI PCI IO port resource boundary check in:
>
> acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()
>
> is currently applied blindly in the ACPI resource parsing to all
> architectures, but only x86 suffers from that IO space limitation.
> The check in generic ACPI code leaves other arches (ie IA64) IO space
> broken (ie kernel can't claim IO resources since the host bridge
> IO resource is disabled and discarded by ACPI core code, eg log on
> IA64):
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: [1002:515e] type 00 class 0x030000
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x80000000-0x87ffffff pref]
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x1000-0x10ff]
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x88020000-0x8802ffff]
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x88000000-0x8801ffff pref]
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: supports D1 D2
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 1 [io  0x1000-0x10ff]: no compatible
> bridge window
>
> For this reason, the IO port resources boundaries check in generic ACPI
> parsing code should be moved to x86 arch code so that more arches (ie
> ARM64) can benefit from the generic ACPI resources parsing interface
> without incurring in unexpected resource filtering, fixing at the same
> time current breakage on IA64.
>
> This patch moves the IO ports boundary [0 - 64k] check to x86 arch code
> code that validates the PCI host bridge resources.
>
> Fixes: 3772aea7d6f3 ("ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing
> interface for host bridge")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
>   arch/x86/pci/acpi.c     | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/acpi/resource.c |  3 ---
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..e20dbe5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -275,11 +275,14 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>    *     to access PCI configuration space.
>    *
>    * So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF].
> + *
> + * Furthermore, IO ports address space is limited to 16k on x86,

Minor typo for '16k', should be '64k'? or we can just specify
the magic number 0x10003?

By the way, I tested this patch both on x86 and ia64 box,
and PCI for both box is working properly after boot,

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-01 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01 10:25 [PATCH] PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-01 11:36 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2016-02-01 13:34   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-09 14:57   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-09 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-09 18:11   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56AF4359.1020709@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).