From: "Yong, Jonathan" <jonathan.yong@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:27:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7C771.6060700@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160314154215.GB13471@localhost>
On 03/14/2016 23:42, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> The nomenclature is confusing, but I think you're reading this
> backwards. An Upstream Port is on the downstream end of a Link. The
> "Upstream" definition in the PCIe spec "Terms and Acronyms" section
> says:
>
> The Port on a Switch that is closest topologically to the Root Complex
> is the Upstream Port. The Port on a component that contains only
> Endpoint or Bridge Functions is an Upstream Port.
>
> I think the spec is saying that PTM must be enabled in a bridge before
> it is enabled in any device downstream from the bridge.
>
Thanks for the explanation, looks like back to the drawing board. Do you
recommend using pci_walk_bus on all potential PTM masters?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 7:26 [RFC] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-11 7:26 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-11 15:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14 7:44 ` Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-14 15:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-15 8:27 ` Yong, Jonathan [this message]
2016-03-15 13:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-23 2:47 [RFC v2] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-23 2:47 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-23 3:11 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-23 3:57 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-23 4:04 [RFC v3] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-03-23 4:04 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-12 4:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-12 4:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-19 6:24 [RFC v4] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-19 6:24 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-19 6:29 [RFC v4] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-19 6:29 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-29 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-30 12:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-10 3:52 ` Yong, Jonathan
2016-05-08 2:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-09 3:11 ` Yong, Jonathan
2016-05-09 13:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E7C771.6060700@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.yong@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).