From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.9]:55248 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752925AbcCOLdd (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:33:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Request for Info: Designware PCIe Root Complex support in ARM64 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas References: <56E2ACF8.6030503@synopsys.com> <20160311194600.GA16257@localhost> <20160314121538.GB6629@red-moon> CC: Joao Pinto , Liviu Dudau , , From: Joao Pinto Message-ID: <56E7F308.2020907@synopsys.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:33:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160314121538.GB6629@red-moon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! Just built the linux-next for ARM64 and built beautifully so there is no issue. I was having an issue using 3.18, but with this new kernel no issues were found. Thanks for all your inputs! Joao On 3/14/2016 12:15 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:46:00PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> [+cc Lorenzo] >> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33:12AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote: >>> Hi Liviu, Catalin and Bjorn, >>> >>> I am currently working on the PCIe Root Complex based on the Designware Core >>> (/pci/host/pcie-desigware.c). I have noticed that currently building a solution >>> based on the previous for an ARM64 CPU is problematic and demands some tweaking >>> in the ARM64 arch (like adding some functions in the pcibios, etc.). >> >> If I understand you correctly, you're saying that pcie-designware.c >> doesn't build on arm64. It would be helpful to know exactly what >> problem you're seeing (what kernel version, what config, what the >> error are, etc.) > > Yes, I am not sure I understand what Joao is referring to so I would > be grateful if he can provide us with additional details. > > Thanks, > Lorenzo >