linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:35:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F25552.3080609@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458558775-6242-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On 2016/3/21 19:12, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The [0 - 64k] ACPI PCI IO port resource boundary check in:
>
> acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()
>
> is currently applied blindly in the ACPI resource parsing to all
> architectures, but only x86 suffers from that IO space limitation.
>
> On arches (ie IA64 and ARM64) where IO space is memory mapped,
> the PCI root bridges IO resource windows are firstly initialized from
> the _CRS (in acpi_decode_space()) and contain the CPU physical address
> at which a root bridge decodes IO space in the CPU physical address
> space with the offset value representing the offset required to translate
> the PCI bus address into the CPU physical address.
>
> The IO resource windows are then parsed and updated in arch code
> before creating and enumerating PCI buses (eg IA64 add_io_space())
> to map in an arch specific way the obtained CPU physical address range
> to a slice of virtual address space reserved to map PCI IO space,
> ending up with PCI bridges resource windows containing IO
> resources like the following on a working IA64 configuration:
>
> PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000000-0x100ffff window] (bus
> address [0x0000-0xffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00]
>
> This implies that the [0 - 64K] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()
> leaves platforms with memory mapped IO space (ie IA64) broken (ie kernel
> can't claim IO resources since the host bridge IO resource is disabled
> and discarded by ACPI core code, see log on IA64 with missing root bridge
> IO resource, silently filtered by current [0 - 64k] check in
> acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()):
>
> PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00]
>
> [...]
>
> pci 0000:00:03.0: [1002:515e] type 00 class 0x030000
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x80000000-0x87ffffff pref]
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x14: [io  0x1000-0x10ff]
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x88020000-0x8802ffff]
> pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x88000000-0x8801ffff pref]
> pci 0000:00:03.0: supports D1 D2
> pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 1 [io  0x1000-0x10ff]: no compatible
> bridge window
>
> For this reason, the IO port resources boundaries check in generic ACPI
> parsing code should be guarded with a CONFIG_X86 guard so that more arches
> (ie ARM64) can benefit from the generic ACPI resources parsing interface
> without incurring in unexpected resource filtering, fixing at the same
> time current breakage on IA64.
>
> This patch factors out IO ports boundary [0 - 64k] check in generic ACPI
> code and makes the IO space check X86 specific to make sure that IO
> space resources are usable on other arches too.
>
> Fixes: 3772aea7d6f3 ("ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing
> interface for host bridge")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
> v2 -> v3
>
> - Moved IO resource check to generic ACPI resource code
> - Dropped Tested-by tags
> - Rebased against v4.5

Add this patch on top of Linus's latest tree, and test it
on a HP rx2660 IA64 machine, the machine boot with NIC
working properly, and no regressions in boot log.

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Thanks
Hanjun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-21 11:12 [PATCH v3] PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-21 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-22 13:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-22 14:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-23  8:35 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F25552.3080609@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).