From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <57BB9537.6040002@intel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:13:43 +0800 From: "Yong, Jonathan" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Helgaas CC: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jeff Kirsher , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI: Add Precision Time Measurement (PTM) support References: <20160613185945.12503.32760.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20160613190534.12503.18923.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <57AA984E.8040308@intel.com> <20160815185931.GD9790@localhost> <57B2C90F.8010109@intel.com> <20160816133715.GA30825@localhost> <20160822170110.GE18628@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20160822170110.GE18628@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: On 08/23/2016 01:01, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:37:15AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:04:31PM +0800, Yong, Jonathan wrote: >>> On 08/16/2016 02:59, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> >>>> I guess I was hoping you could test these patches. Do you have any >>>> way to do that? >>>> >>> >>> No real hardware with this feature yet, so testing is entirely on software. >> >> OK, let me know the results of your software testing with these patches. > > Do you have some software testing you can do on these patches? > Yes, they're entirely synthetic however and do not reflect real hardware. At the moment, they're hooks to pci_scan_bus and providing a fake config space for the driver to manipulate, inspected with lspci. The PTM bits are set properly as far as I can tell.