From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@gmail.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark Haswell Power Control Unit as having non-compliant BARs
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:12:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C7100D.3010407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL-B5D1Jb9QGimAar-wojBp--A3TriVtAe_MeZ7vYAOsPyrqsQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/31/2016 12:46 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>> The Haswell Power Control Unit has a non-PCI register (CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL)
>> where BAR 0 is supposed to be. This is erratum HSE43 in the spec update
>> referenced below:
>>
>> The PCIe* Base Specification indicates that Configuration Space Headers
>> have a base address register at offset 0x10. Due to this erratum, the
>> Power Control Unit's CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL CSR (Bus 1; Device 30; Function
>> 3; Offset 0x10) is located where a base register is expected.
>>
>> Mark the PCU as having non-compliant BARs so we don't try to probe any of
>> them. There are no other BARs on this device.
>>
>> Rename the quirk so it's not Broadwell-specific.
>
> While it's not a big enough battle to fight it sure is irritating to
> see vendors make the same mistakes over and over again. Wondering if
> this an error on the respective vendor's BIOS team's part or is this
> is just being inherited over and over again from Intel's Premier BIOS
> team reference code?
>
This isn't a BIOS issue. The actual hardware is manufactured this
way, and the documentation indicates that the hardware has
non-compliant BARs.
Testing and reviewing now ...
P.
>>
>> Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v3-spec-update.html
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153881
>> Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/pci/fixup.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> index 837ea36..6d52b94 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> @@ -553,15 +553,21 @@ static void twinhead_reserve_killing_zone(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x27B9, twinhead_reserve_killing_zone);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Broadwell EP Home Agent BARs erroneously return non-zero values when read.
>> + * Device [8086:2fc0]
>> + * Erratum HSE43
>> + * CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL CSR Implemented at Incorrect Offset
>> + * http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v3-spec-update.html
>> *
>> - * See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v4-spec-update.html
>> - * entry BDF2.
>> + * Devices [8086:6f60,6fa0,6fc0]
>> + * Erratum BDF2
>> + * PCI BARs in the Home Agent Will Return Non-Zero Values During Enumeration
>> + * http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v4-spec-update.html
>> */
>> -static void pci_bdwep_bar(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +static void pci_invalid_bar(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> dev->non_compliant_bars = 1;
>> }
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f60, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fa0, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2fc0, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f60, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fa0, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0, pci_invalid_bar);
>>
>
> Acked-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 15:50 [PATCH] PCI: Mark Haswell Power Control Unit as having non-compliant BARs Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-31 16:46 ` Myron Stowe
2016-08-31 17:12 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2016-08-31 17:45 ` Myron Stowe
2016-08-31 17:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-08-31 17:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-01 13:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C7100D.3010407@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myron.stowe@gmail.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).