From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ddutile@redhat.com>
Return-Path: <ddutile@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] ACPI namespace details for ARM64
To: "'astone@redhat.com'" <'astone@redhat.com'>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
References: <20161109220506.GN14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
 <a0829be4-6324-758b-2fe6-a274f715a3a9@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Robert Richter
 <rrichter@cavium.com>,
        Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
        Sinan Kaya
 <okaya@codeaurora.org>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <58253C0E.4060003@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:33:34 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a0829be4-6324-758b-2fe6-a274f715a3a9@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/10/2016 06:18 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on
>> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for
>> PCI.  I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm
>> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to
>> make sure we're all on the same page.  Please correct my errors and
>> misunderstandings.
>>
>> Bjorn
>>
>> [snip....]
>
> A big +1 to all of this.  This also looks like something that should
> be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three).
> What do you think?
>
> Thank you for putting this together, Bjorn.
>
>
+1. One-stop shopping! :)
Nice summary, and clarification(s).