From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <5825D967.5050505@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:44:55 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Al Stone CC: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Al Stone , Robert Richter , Gabriele Paoloni , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Jon Masters , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Don Dutile , Christopher Covington , Sinan Kaya , Tomasz Nowicki Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] ACPI namespace details for ARM64 References: <20161109220506.GN14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20161111093226.GA13333@red-moon> In-Reply-To: <20161111093226.GA13333@red-moon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed List-ID: On 11/11/2016 05:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:18:54PM -0700, Al Stone wrote: >> On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on >>> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for >>> PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm >>> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to >>> make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and >>> misunderstandings. >>> >>> Bjorn >>> >>> [snip....] >> >> A big +1 to all of this. This also looks like something that should >> be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three). > > And to arm64 platforms FW :) > >> What do you think? > > I do not think there is anything ARM64 specific in Bjorn's description, > but I do think it is very useful to have it in documentation, these > bits of information are scattered around ACPI specs and PCI FW specs, > having a single source would help and would have prevented asking > Bjorn the same questions 100 times. > >> Thank you for putting this together, Bjorn. > > +1, Thank you very much for this nice summary Bjorn. +1, thanks a lot :) Hanjun