From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: resume path in dra7xx and other DW-based drivers To: Bjorn Helgaas References: <20161207220234.GG22129@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <58491E7C.1070700@ti.com> <20161208204304.GC30533@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> CC: , Jingoo Han , Richard Zhu , Lucas Stach , Murali Karicheri , Minghuan Lian , Mingkai Hu , Roy Zang , Thomas Petazzoni , Niklas Cassel , Jesper Nilsson , Pratyush Anand , Jose Abreu , Stanimir Varbanov From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <5858CED7.4020004@ti.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:55:27 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161208204304.GC30533@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" List-ID: Hi Bjorn, On Friday 09 December 2016 02:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:19:00PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Bjorn, >> >> On Thursday 08 December 2016 03:32 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> Hi Kishon, et al, >>> >>> Does dra7xx suspend/resume work? I'm not sure dra7xx_pcie_resume() >>> and dra7xx_pcie_resume_noirq() restore everything necessary. For >>> example, the probe path has this: >>> >>> dra7xx_pcie_probe >>> dra7xx_add_pcie_port >>> dw_pcie_host_init >>> dra7xx_pcie_host_init # .host_init >>> dw_pcie_setup_rc >>> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu >>> >>> so I think it programs the ATU in dw_pcie_setup_rc(). But the resume >>> path doesn't call dw_pcie_setup_rc(), so I don't see where the ATU >>> setup would be restored. >> >> DRA7xx only supported shallow power state and not deep power state. In shallow >> power state, the register settings are not lost and hence we didn't have to >> restore anything. > > I'm not really a PM guy, so I'm not familiar with shallow power state. > Could I have discovered from the code somehow that dra7xx suspend to > shallow power state preserves register state? It's nice if a reader > can verify correctness without knowing the system-specific details. Some drivers like drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c saves the register contents (omap_hsmmc_context_save) and then in runtime_resume checks if the register contents are still same (omap_hsmmc_context_restore). Do you think we have to do something like that for dra7xx? omap_hsmmc.c is used by a lot of platforms some of which loses the context during suspend. Since dra7xx doesn't loose context, not sure if we have to do something like omap_hsmmc. Thanks Kishon