linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
	Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	jorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	<gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>, <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:21:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5876CBEC.9070406@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111213727.GO14532@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

On 2017/1/12 5:37, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 03:00:06PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and
>> bus range) may span multiple host bridges.
>>
>> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host
>> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start
>> value which would cause configurations like the following:
>>
>> MCFG region:
>> 	bus range: 0x00~0xff.
>> 	segment: 0.
>>
>> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges):
>> 	host bridge 1:
>> 		bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
>> 		segment: 0.
>> 	host bridge 2:
>> 		bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
>> 		segment: 0.
>>
>> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does
>> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region.
>>
>> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for
>> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same
>> MCFG region.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> 
> Applied to pci/enumeration for v4.11 with the following changelog:
> 
>     PCI/ACPI: Fix bus range comparison in pci_mcfg_lookup()
>     
>     The configuration data provided by an MCFG entry, i.e., PCI segment and bus
>     range, may span multiple host bridges.
>     
>     pci_mcfg_lookup() previously required an exact match of the host bridge
>     starting bus and the MCFG starting bus, which made the following
>     configuration fail:
>     
>       MCFG region:
>         segment: 0
>         bus range: 0x00-0xff
>     
>       host bridge
>         segment: 0
>         bus range: 0x20-0x4f
>     
>     Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() so we can use any MCFG entry
>     that contains the required bus range, as we do in pci_mmconfig_lookup().
>     
>     [bhelgaas: changelog]
>     Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>     Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>

Hi Bjorn,

Many thanks for modifying the commit message and merging this patch!

Best regards,
Zhou

>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres,
>>  		goto skip_lookup;
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
>> -	 * specified by caller.
>> +	 * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
>>  	 */
>>  	list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
>> -		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
>> +		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
>>  		    e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) {
>>  			root->mcfg_addr = e->addr;
>>  		}
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> .
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04  7:00 [PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup Zhou Wang
2017-01-09  3:39 ` Zhou Wang
2017-01-09 21:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-01-11  0:36     ` Zhou Wang
2017-01-11 21:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-12  0:21   ` Zhou Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5876CBEC.9070406@hisilicon.com \
    --to=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).