From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activating CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:30:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <599B975C.20807@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3312094.6zR5NuJAgK@phil>
Hi Heiko,
On 08/10/2017 08:22 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>
>> >+ devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
>> >+ rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks, rockchip);
>> >+
> err = devm_add_action_or_reset(...)
> if (err) {
> ...
> }
>
> devm_add_action_or_reset can fail. When it fails, it will call the
> action already, so your error handling does not need to disable
> clocks on its own.
>
>
> Also, as a more general comment, right now you do devm_request_irq
> from rockchip_pcie_parse_dt, which gets called_before_ clocks are
> enabled.
>
> This will likely bite you at some point as well, as the irq can fire at
> any point after it got requested ... including before you enable the
> clocks.
>
> So the order should probably be
>
> - enable clocks
> - register devm_action to shutdown clocks
> - parse_dt including requesting the irq.
>
>
> Heiko
it turns out this irq handler not only depends on clks, but also pm
domain :(
so handling it with devm_* functions would be a little
complicated(https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/15/146).
would it make sense to use request_irq/free_irq directly?
or maybe add a flag(for example probed), and check it in the irq handler
before read registers? then we would just need to make sure the priv
struct be freed later than the irq.
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-22 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 11:18 [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activating CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ Shawn Lin
2017-08-10 12:22 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-22 2:30 ` jeffy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=599B975C.20807@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).