From: John Youn <john.youn@synopsys.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Lukas F. Hartmann" <lukas@mntmn.com>,
Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>,
John Youn <john.youn@synopsys.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] PCI: Check for USB xHCI class for HAPS platform
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:01:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d78ac08-0809-d219-ff7c-5cea5f7aba8b@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205233159.GC7268@google.com>
On 02/05/2019 03:32 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Richard, Lucas]
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:04:28PM -0800, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> The Synopsys HAPS USB controller has a VID PID (16c3,abcd) that matches
>> to an existing PCIe controller. This quirk is intended for USB HAPS
>> devices only. To fix this, check for the PCI class USB xHCI to prevent
>> matching the PCIe controllers.
>
> So there are at least three different parts with the same Vendor &
> Device ID ([16c3:abcd]):
>
> 1) Synopsys HAPS USB3 controller
> 2) Synopsys PCIe IP in the NXP i.MX6QP (reported by Lukas)
> 3) Synopsys PCIe IP in the NXP i.MX7D (reported by Trent)
>
> I don't know if Synopsys is to blame for 2 & 3, or if NXP was expected
> to change the Vendor ID when incorporating the Synopsys IP into the
> i.MX designs. But even leaving the default Device ID of the PCIe IP
> the same as another Synopsys device was probably a bad idea.
Hi Bjorn,
From talking with our PCIe folks, our best guess is a vendor
misconfiguration. The PCIe IP ships with a different PID by default
and does not collide with USB.
> dwc3-haps claims by Vendor & Device ID; it doesn't look at the Class
> Code. What happens when it tries to claim the PCIe IP in i.MX?
We can add the class code to dwc3-haps to account for this.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-05 21:22 [PATCH RESEND] PCI: Check for USB xHCI class for HAPS platform Thinh Nguyen
2019-02-05 23:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-06 1:01 ` John Youn [this message]
2019-02-06 1:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-06 9:27 ` Lucas Stach
2019-02-06 23:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d78ac08-0809-d219-ff7c-5cea5f7aba8b@synopsys.com \
--to=john.youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@mntmn.com \
--cc=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=tpiepho@impinj.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).