Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] vfio_pci: Loop using PCI_STD_NUM_BARS

Alex Williamson
2019-08-16T16:23:50Z

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:24:35 +0300
Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> wrote:

> Refactor loops to use 'i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS' instead of
> 'i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 11 +++++++----
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 10 ++++++----
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 703948c9fbe1..cb7d220d3246 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -110,13 +110,15 @@ static inline bool vfio_pci_is_vga(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> {
> struct resource *res;
> - int bar;
> + int i;
> struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource *dummy_res;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list);
>
> - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) {
> - res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar;
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> + int bar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
> +
> + res = &vdev->pdev->resource[bar];
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP))
> goto no_mmap;
> @@ -399,7 +401,8 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
>
> vfio_config_free(vdev);
>
> - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> + bar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
> if (!vdev->barmap[bar])
> continue;
> pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index f0891bd8444c..df8772395219 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -455,16 +455,18 @@ static void vfio_bar_fixup(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
>
> bar = (__le32 *)&vdev->vconfig[PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0];
>
> - for (i = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++, bar++) {
> - if (!pci_resource_start(pdev, i)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++, bar++) {
> + int ibar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
> +
> + if (!pci_resource_start(pdev, ibar)) {
> *bar = 0; /* Unmapped by host = unimplemented to user */
> continue;
> }
>
> - mask = ~(pci_resource_len(pdev, i) - 1);
> + mask = ~(pci_resource_len(pdev, ibar) - 1);
>
> *bar &= cpu_to_le32((u32)mask);
> - *bar |= vfio_generate_bar_flags(pdev, i);
> + *bar |= vfio_generate_bar_flags(pdev, ibar);
>
> if (*bar & cpu_to_le32(PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)) {
> bar++;

It might be a bit cleaner to rename the 'bar' variable to 'vbar', then
we have 'bar' available to use as the BAR number. It seems more
consistent with other uses. Otherwise the logic looks fine. Thanks,

Alex

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> index ee6ee91718a4..8a2c7607d513 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_reflck {
>
> struct vfio_pci_device {
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> - void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1];
> - bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1];
> + void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> + bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> u8 *pci_config_map;
> u8 *vconfig;
> struct perm_bits *msi_perm;