From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:14:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63cf30e1136fb_570929481@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b03b8f4d2d04cf7e4997c71daee667c73eb427b.1674468099.git.lukas@wunner.de>
Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Currently a DOE instance cannot be shared by multiple drivers because
> each driver creates its own pci_doe_mb struct for a given DOE instance.
> For the same reason a DOE instance cannot be shared between the PCI core
> and a driver.
>
> Overcome this limitation by creating mailboxes in the PCI core on device
> enumeration. Provide a pci_find_doe_mailbox() API call to allow drivers
> to get a pci_doe_mb for a given (pci_dev, vendor, protocol) triple.
>
> On device removal, tear down mailboxes in two steps:
>
> In pci_stop_dev(), before the driver is unbound, stop ongoing DOE
> exchanges and prevent new ones from being scheduled. This ensures that
> a hot-removed device doesn't needlessly wait for a running exchange to
> time out.
>
> In pci_destroy_dev(), after the driver is unbound, free the mailboxes
> and their internal data structures.
>
> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
I rather like this. Much cleaner, thanks!
Minor comment below.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> ---
> drivers/pci/doe.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 10 ++++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 1 +
> drivers/pci/remove.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/pci-doe.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 ++
> 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> index cc1fdd75ad2a..06c57af05570 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
> #include <linux/pci-doe.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> +#include "pci.h"
> +
> #define PCI_DOE_PROTOCOL_DISCOVERY 0
>
> /* Timeout of 1 second from 6.30.2 Operation, PCI Spec r6.0 */
> @@ -662,3 +664,72 @@ int pci_doe(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u16 vendor, u8 type,
> return task.rv;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_doe);
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_find_doe_mailbox() - Find Data Object Exchange mailbox
> + *
> + * @pdev: PCI device
> + * @vendor: Vendor ID
> + * @type: Data Object Type
> + *
> + * Find first DOE mailbox of a PCI device which supports the given protocol.
> + *
> + * RETURNS: Pointer to the DOE mailbox or NULL if none was found.
> + */
> +struct pci_doe_mb *pci_find_doe_mailbox(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 vendor,
> + u8 type)
> +{
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> + unsigned long index;
> +
> + xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb)
> + if (pci_doe_supports_prot(doe_mb, vendor, type))
> + return doe_mb;
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_find_doe_mailbox);
> +
> +void pci_doe_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> + u16 offset = 0;
> + int rc;
> +
> + xa_init(&pdev->doe_mbs);
> +
> + while ((offset = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pdev, offset,
> + PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DOE))) {
> + doe_mb = pci_doe_create_mb(pdev, offset);
> + if (IS_ERR(doe_mb))
> + continue;
I feel like a pci_dbg() would be nice here. But not needed.
Ira
> +
> + rc = xa_insert(&pdev->doe_mbs, offset, doe_mb, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (rc) {
> + pci_doe_flush_mb(doe_mb);
> + pci_doe_destroy_mb(doe_mb);
> + pci_err(pdev, "[%x] failed to insert mailbox: %d\n",
> + offset, rc);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void pci_doe_stop(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> + unsigned long index;
> +
> + xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb)
> + pci_doe_flush_mb(doe_mb);
> +}
> +
> +void pci_doe_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> + unsigned long index;
> +
> + xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb)
> + pci_doe_destroy_mb(doe_mb);
> +
> + xa_destroy(&pdev->doe_mbs);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 9ed3b5550043..94656c1a01c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -777,6 +777,16 @@ static inline pci_power_t mid_pci_get_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOE
> +void pci_doe_init(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +void pci_doe_stop(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +void pci_doe_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +#else
> +static inline void pci_doe_init(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> +static inline void pci_doe_stop(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> +static inline void pci_doe_destroy(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Config Address for PCI Configuration Mechanism #1
> *
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 1779582fb500..65e60ee50489 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2476,6 +2476,7 @@ static void pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_aer_init(dev); /* Advanced Error Reporting */
> pci_dpc_init(dev); /* Downstream Port Containment */
> pci_rcec_init(dev); /* Root Complex Event Collector */
> + pci_doe_init(dev); /* Data Object Exchange */
>
> pcie_report_downtraining(dev);
> pci_init_reset_methods(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> index 0145aef1b930..739c7b0f5b91 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ static void pci_free_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> static void pci_stop_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> + pci_doe_stop(dev);
> pci_pme_active(dev, false);
>
> if (pci_dev_is_added(dev)) {
> @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ static void pci_destroy_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> list_del(&dev->bus_list);
> up_write(&pci_bus_sem);
>
> + pci_doe_destroy(dev);
> pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(dev);
> pci_bridge_d3_update(dev);
> pci_free_resources(dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-doe.h b/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> index 7f16749c6aa3..d6192ee0ac07 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct pci_doe_mb;
>
> struct pci_doe_mb *pcim_doe_create_mb(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 cap_offset);
> bool pci_doe_supports_prot(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u16 vid, u8 type);
> +struct pci_doe_mb *pci_find_doe_mailbox(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 vendor,
> + u8 type);
>
> int pci_doe(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u16 vendor, u8 type,
> const void *request, size_t request_sz,
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index adffd65e84b4..254c79f9013a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -511,6 +511,9 @@ struct pci_dev {
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA
> struct pci_p2pdma __rcu *p2pdma;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOE
> + struct xarray doe_mbs; /* Data Object Exchange mailboxes */
> #endif
> u16 acs_cap; /* ACS Capability offset */
> phys_addr_t rom; /* Physical address if not from BAR */
> --
> 2.39.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 10:10 [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:33 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-25 21:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 16:18 ` Gregory Price
2023-02-10 23:50 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:35 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 23:52 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:48 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 20:07 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 23:57 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:52 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-03 8:53 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 8:56 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 9:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 11:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:55 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 11:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 12:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-03 9:06 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 9:09 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 10:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 22:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:14 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2023-01-24 12:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:18 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:25 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-24 1:43 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 21:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 23:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-25 9:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-10 21:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 0:04 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63cf30e1136fb_570929481@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).