* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-3-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> @ 2018-02-22 9:03 ` Yisheng Xie 2018-02-22 13:17 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Yisheng Xie @ 2018-02-22 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm, joro, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Lorenzo Pieralisi, hanjun.guo, Sudeep Holla, rjw, lenb, Robin Murphy, bhelgaas, alex.williamson, tn, liubo95, thunder.leizhen, xuzaibo, ilias.apalodimas, jonathan.cameron, shunyong.yang, nwatters, okaya, jcrouse, rfranz, dwmw2, jacob.jun.pan, yi.l.liu, ashok.raj, robdclark, christian.koenig, bharatku, robh Hi Jean, On 2018/2/22 14:23, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > @@ -129,7 +439,10 @@ int iommu_sva_device_shutdown(struct device *dev) > int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, > unsigned long flags, void *drvdata) > { > + int i, ret; > + struct io_mm *io_mm = NULL; > struct iommu_domain *domain; > + struct iommu_bond *bond = NULL, *tmp; > struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; > > domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); > @@ -145,7 +458,42 @@ int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, > if (flags != (IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID | IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF)) > return -EINVAL; > > - return -ENOSYS; /* TODO */ > + /* If an io_mm already exists, use it */ > + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); > + idr_for_each_entry(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, i) { > + if (io_mm->mm != mm || !io_mm_get_locked(io_mm)) > + continue; > + > + /* Is it already bound to this device? */ > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { > + if (tmp->dev != dev) > + continue; > + > + bond = tmp; > + refcount_inc(&bond->refs); > + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); Should io_mm->pasid still be set to *pasid when the device already bond? so driver can always get the right pasid if it bond to a mm multi-times, without keeping the pasid itself? Thanks Yisheng > + break; > + } > + break; > + } > + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > + > + if (bond) > + return 0; > + > + if (!io_mm) { > + io_mm = io_mm_alloc(domain, dev, mm); > + if (IS_ERR(io_mm)) > + return PTR_ERR(io_mm); > + } > + > + ret = io_mm_attach(domain, dev, io_mm, drvdata); > + if (ret) > + io_mm_put(io_mm); > + else > + *pasid = io_mm->pasid; > + > + return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_bind_device); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Yisheng Xie @ 2018-02-22 13:17 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-02-22 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yisheng Xie Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, robdclark@gmail.com, bharatku@xilinx.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org On 22/02/18 09:03, Yisheng Xie wrote: [...] >> + /* Is it already bound to this device? */ >> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { >> + if (tmp->dev != dev) >> + continue; >> + >> + bond = tmp; >> + refcount_inc(&bond->refs); >> + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); > > Should io_mm->pasid still be set to *pasid when the device already bond? so driver can > always get the right pasid if it bond to a mm multi-times, without keeping the pasid itself? (Assuming you mean set *pasid = io_mm->pasid) I think it should, I seem to have removed it by accident from this version Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1519280641-30258-37-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 37/37] vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-37-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> @ 2018-03-19 9:47 ` Yisheng Xie 2018-03-21 13:40 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Yisheng Xie @ 2018-03-19 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm, joro, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Lorenzo Pieralisi, hanjun.guo, Sudeep Holla, rjw, lenb, Robin Murphy, bhelgaas, alex.williamson, tn, liubo95, thunder.leizhen, xuzaibo, ilias.apalodimas, jonathan.cameron, shunyong.yang, nwatters, okaya, jcrouse, rfranz, dwmw2, jacob.jun.pan, yi.l.liu, ashok.raj, robdclark, christian.koenig, bharatku, robh Hi Jean, vfio can be compiled as module, however you use some functions which are not exported. comment inline: [...] > Add two new ioctl for VFIO containers. VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS creates a > bond between a container and a process address space, identified by a > device-specific ID named PASID. This allows the device to target DMA > transactions at the process virtual addresses without a need for mapping > and unmapping buffers explicitly in the IOMMU. The process page tables are > shared with the IOMMU, and mechanisms such as PCI ATS/PRI are used to > handle faults. VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_PROCESS removes a bond created with > VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> > --- [...] > +static struct mm_struct *vfio_iommu_get_mm_by_vpid(pid_t vpid) > +{ > + struct mm_struct *mm; > + struct task_struct *task; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + task = find_task_by_vpid(vpid); Maybe can use? task = pid_task(find_vpid(params.vpid), PIDTYPE_PID) > + if (task) > + get_task_struct(task); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + if (!task) > + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); > + > + /* Ensure that current has RW access on the mm */ > + mm = mm_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS); You will try to export mm_access, I find Felix have tried to, but seems give up: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9744281/ Thanks Yisheng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 37/37] vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing 2018-03-19 9:47 ` [PATCH 37/37] vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing Yisheng Xie @ 2018-03-21 13:40 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-21 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yisheng Xie Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, robdclark@gmail.com, bharatku@xilinx.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org On 19/03/18 09:47, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Hi Jean, > > vfio can be compiled as module, however you use some functions which are not > exported. Oh right. I remember the kbuild test robot warning about this once, I wonder why it didn't find this one. > comment inline: > > [...] >> Add two new ioctl for VFIO containers. VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS creates a >> bond between a container and a process address space, identified by a >> device-specific ID named PASID. This allows the device to target DMA >> transactions at the process virtual addresses without a need for mapping >> and unmapping buffers explicitly in the IOMMU. The process page tables are >> shared with the IOMMU, and mechanisms such as PCI ATS/PRI are used to >> handle faults. VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_PROCESS removes a bond created with >> VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PROCESS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> >> --- > [...] >> +static struct mm_struct *vfio_iommu_get_mm_by_vpid(pid_t vpid) >> +{ >> + struct mm_struct *mm; >> + struct task_struct *task; >> + >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> + task = find_task_by_vpid(vpid); > > Maybe can use? > task = pid_task(find_vpid(params.vpid), PIDTYPE_PID) I'd rather submit a patch requesting to export the symbol. Especially since this function can be further simplified by using the brand new find_get_task_by_vpid() helper, introduced by 2ee0826085d1. >> + if (task) >> + get_task_struct(task); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + if (!task) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); >> + >> + /* Ensure that current has RW access on the mm */ >> + mm = mm_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS); > > You will try to export mm_access, I find Felix have tried to, but seems give up: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9744281/ Thanks for the pointer, I'll try to revive this. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1519280641-30258-27-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-27-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> @ 2018-03-19 11:03 ` Yisheng Xie 2018-03-21 13:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Yisheng Xie @ 2018-03-19 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas, kvm, linux-pci, xuzaibo, jonathan.cameron, Will Deacon, okaya, robh, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj, tn, joro, robdclark, bharatku, linux-acpi, Catalin Marinas, rfranz, lenb, devicetree, jacob.jun.pan, alex.williamson, yi.l.liu, thunder.leizhen, bhelgaas, linux-arm-kernel, shunyong.yang, dwmw2, liubo95, rjw, jcrouse, iommu, hanjun.guo, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig, nwatters Hi Jean, [...] > @@ -3168,6 +3260,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (smmu->features & (ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS | ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)) { > + smmu->faultq_nb.notifier_call = arm_smmu_flush_queues; > + ret = iommu_fault_queue_register(&smmu->faultq_nb); > + if (ret) > + return ret; I find a case here: CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT=n, and smmu support feature STALLS or PRI, the device probe will failed here, is this what we want? Thanks Yisheng > + } > + > /* And we're up. Go go go! */ > ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&smmu->iommu, dev, NULL, > "smmu3.%pa", &ioaddr); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue 2018-03-19 11:03 ` [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue Yisheng Xie @ 2018-03-21 13:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-22 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-21 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yisheng Xie Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, robdclark@gmail.com, bharatku@xilinx.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org Hi Yisheng, On 19/03/18 11:03, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Hi Jean, > > [...] >> @@ -3168,6 +3260,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> + if (smmu->features & (ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS | ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)) { >> + smmu->faultq_nb.notifier_call = arm_smmu_flush_queues; >> + ret = iommu_fault_queue_register(&smmu->faultq_nb); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; > > I find a case here: CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT=n, and smmu support feature STALLS or PRI, > the device probe will failed here, is this what we want? Since CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3 selects CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT, I don't think it can happen. I'm not sure what the best practices are, but I feel like it would be too much work to guard against config combinations that violate an explicit "select" in Kconfig Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue 2018-03-21 13:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-22 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie 2018-04-04 10:13 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Yisheng Xie @ 2018-03-22 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, robdclark@gmail.com, bharatku@xilinx.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org Hi Jean, On 2018/3/21 21:24, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Yisheng, > > On 19/03/18 11:03, Yisheng Xie wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >> [...] >>> @@ -3168,6 +3260,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> if (ret) >>> return ret; >>> >>> + if (smmu->features & (ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS | ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)) { >>> + smmu->faultq_nb.notifier_call = arm_smmu_flush_queues; >>> + ret = iommu_fault_queue_register(&smmu->faultq_nb); >>> + if (ret) >>> + return ret; >> >> I find a case here: CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT=n, and smmu support feature STALLS or PRI, >> the device probe will failed here, is this what we want? > > Since CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3 selects CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT, I don't think it > can happen. But CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT can be changed after select, maybe can make it as unchangeable. Thanks Yisheng > I'm not sure what the best practices are, but I feel like it > would be too much work to guard against config combinations that violate > an explicit "select" in Kconfig > > Thanks, > Jean > > . > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue 2018-03-22 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie @ 2018-04-04 10:13 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-04-04 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yisheng Xie Cc: Mark Rutland, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, robdclark@gmail.com, bharatku@xilinx.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org On 22/03/18 01:09, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On 2018/3/21 21:24, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> Hi Yisheng, >> >> On 19/03/18 11:03, Yisheng Xie wrote: >>> Hi Jean, >>> >>> [...] >>>> @@ -3168,6 +3260,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> if (ret) >>>> return ret; >>>> >>>> + if (smmu->features & (ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS | ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)) { >>>> + smmu->faultq_nb.notifier_call = arm_smmu_flush_queues; >>>> + ret = iommu_fault_queue_register(&smmu->faultq_nb); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + return ret; >>> >>> I find a case here: CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT=n, and smmu support feature STALLS or PRI, >>> the device probe will failed here, is this what we want? >> >> Since CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3 selects CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT, I don't think it >> can happen. > > But CONFIG_IOMMU_FAULT can be changed after select, maybe can make it as unchangeable. Seems sensible, I don't see a reason to leave IOMMU_FAULT selectable manually. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/37] Shared Virtual Addressing for the IOMMU @ 2018-02-12 18:33 Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-02-12 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: joro, robh+dt, mark.rutland, catalin.marinas, will.deacon, lorenzo.pieralisi, hanjun.guo, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb, robin.murphy, bhelgaas, alex.williamson, tn, liubo95, thunder.leizhen, xieyisheng1, xuzaibo, ilias.apalodimas, jonathan.cameron, shunyong.yang, nwatters, okaya, jcrouse, rfranz, dwmw2, jacob.jun.pan, yi.l.liu, ashok.raj, robdclark, christian.koenig, bharatku Shared Virtual Addressing (SVA) is the ability to share process address spaces with devices. It is called "SVM" (Shared Virtual Memory) by OpenCL and some IOMMU architectures, but since that abbreviation is already used for AMD virtualisation in Linux (Secure Virtual Machine), we prefer the less ambiguous "SVA". Sharing process address spaces with devices allows to rely on core kernel memory management for DMA, removing some complexity from application and device drivers. After binding to a device, applications can instruct it to perform DMA on buffers obtained with malloc. The device, buses and the IOMMU must support the following features: * Multiple address spaces per device, for example using the PCI PASID (Process Address Space ID) extension. The IOMMU driver allocates a PASID and the device uses it in DMA transactions. * I/O Page Faults (IOPF), for example PCI PRI (Page Request Interface) or Arm SMMU stall. The core mm handles translation faults from the IOMMU. * MMU and IOMMU implement compatible page table formats. This series requires to support all three features. I tried to facilitate using only a subset of them but enabling it requires more work. Upcoming patches will enable private PASID management, which allows device driver to use an API similar to classical DMA, map()/unmap() on PASIDs. In the future device drivers should also be able to use SVA without IOPF by pinning all pages, or without PASID by sharing the single device address space with a process. Although we don't have any performance measurement at the moment, SVA will likely be slower than classical DMA since it relies on page faults, whereas classical DMA pins all pages in memory. SVA mostly aims at simplifying DMA management, but also improves security by isolating address spaces in devices. Intel and AMD IOMMU drivers already offer slightly differing public functions that bind process address spaces to devices. Because they don't go through an architecture-agnostic API, only integrated devices could use them so far. --- The series adds an SVA API to the IOMMU core, an example implementation (SMMUv3), and an example user (VFIO). Since last version, sent as RFCv2 in October [1], I reworked the API and fixed some bugs. Patches 1-6 introduce the bind API and track address spaces. This version of the patchset improves documentation, adds device_init()/ shutdown(), and per-bond device driver data. Functions available to device drivers are: iommu_sva_device_init(dev, features, max_pasid) iommu_sva_device_shutdown(dev) iommu_register_mm_exit_handler(dev, handler) iommu_unregister_mm_exit_handler(dev) iommu_sva_bind_device(dev, mm, *pasid, flags, drvdata) iommu_sva_unbind_device(dev, pasid) Patches 7-10 add a generic fault handler. This version reuses the structures introduced by Jacob Pan's vSVA series [2] (with some changes to match the most recent comments in that thread). Patches 11-36 add complete SVA support to the SMMUv3 driver, for both platform and PCI devices. If you don't care about SMMU I advise to only look at patches 25, 27, 29 and 35, which use the tools introduced earlier. In this version, context code for SMMUv3 moved to a separate module, behind an interface reusable by other IOMMU drivers, and easily extensible for private PASIDs. There are complicated interactions between private and shared contexts (they have a common ASID space), so moving it all to a separate file also helps making sense of refs and locks. Finally, patch 37 adds an ioctl to VFIO providing SVA to userspace drivers. Since last version I fixed a few bugs. You can pull the full series based onto v4.16-rc1+fault patches at: git://linux-arm.org/linux-jpb.git sva/v1 I tested this code on a software model implementing an SMMUv3 and a dummy DMA devices. Any testing report would be greatly appreciated! [1] [RFCv2 PATCH 00/36] Process management for IOMMU + SVM for SMMUv3 https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg609771.html [2] [PATCH v3 00/16] IOMMU driver support for SVM virtualization https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2651481.html Jean-Philippe Brucker (37): iommu: Introduce Shared Virtual Addressing API iommu/sva: Bind process address spaces to devices iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces iommu/sva: Add a mm_exit callback for device drivers iommu/sva: Track mm changes with an MMU notifier iommu/sva: Search mm by PASID iommu: Add a page fault handler iommu/fault: Handle mm faults iommu/fault: Let handler return a fault response iommu/fault: Allow blocking fault handlers dt-bindings: document stall and PASID properties for IOMMU masters iommu/of: Add stall and pasid properties to iommu_fwspec arm64: mm: Pin down ASIDs for sharing mm with devices iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Link domains and devices iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Factor out ARM LPAE register defines iommu: Add generic PASID table library iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move context descriptor code iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Share process page tables iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Seize private ASID iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for VHE iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable broadcast TLB maintenance iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add SVA feature checking iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement mm operations iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Hardware Translation Table Update iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add stall support for platform devices ACPI/IORT: Check ATS capability in root complex nodes iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hook up ATC invalidation to mm ops iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable tagged pointers PCI: Make "PRG Response PASID Required" handling common iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PRI iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/iommu.txt | 24 + MAINTAINERS | 3 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 11 +- arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 87 +- drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 11 + drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 42 + drivers/iommu/Makefile | 4 + drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 19 +- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3-context.c | 728 +++++++++++ drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 1395 ++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c | 384 ++++++ drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 48 +- drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.h | 67 + drivers/iommu/iommu-pasid.c | 54 + drivers/iommu/iommu-pasid.h | 173 +++ drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 795 ++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 109 +- drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 12 + drivers/pci/ats.c | 17 + drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 399 ++++++ include/linux/iommu.h | 217 +++- include/linux/pci-ats.h | 8 + include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 76 ++ 25 files changed, 4381 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3-context.c create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.h create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/iommu-pasid.c create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/iommu-pasid.h create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c -- 2.15.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-12 18:33 [PATCH 00/37] Shared Virtual Addressing for the IOMMU Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-02-12 18:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-02-12 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: joro, robh+dt, mark.rutland, catalin.marinas, will.deacon, lorenzo.pieralisi, hanjun.guo, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb, robin.murphy, bhelgaas, alex.williamson, tn, liubo95, thunder.leizhen, xieyisheng1, xuzaibo, ilias.apalodimas, jonathan.cameron, shunyong.yang, nwatters, okaya, jcrouse, rfranz, dwmw2, jacob.jun.pan, yi.l.liu, ashok.raj, robdclark, christian.koenig, bharatku Introduce boilerplate code for allocating IOMMU mm structures and binding them to devices. Four operations are added to IOMMU drivers: * mm_alloc(): to create an io_mm structure and perform architecture- specific operations required to grab the process (for instance on ARM, pin down the CPU ASID so that the process doesn't get assigned a new ASID on rollover). There is a single valid io_mm structure per Linux mm. Future extensions may also use io_mm for kernel-managed address spaces, populated with map()/unmap() calls instead of bound to process address spaces. This patch focuses on "shared" io_mm. * mm_attach(): attach an mm to a device. The IOMMU driver checks that the device is capable of sharing an address space, and writes the PASID table entry to install the pgd. Some IOMMU drivers will have a single PASID table per domain, for convenience. Other can implement it differently but to help these drivers, mm_attach and mm_detach take 'attach_domain' and 'detach_domain' parameters, that tell whether they need to set and clear the PASID entry or only send the required TLB invalidations. * mm_detach(): detach an mm from a device. The IOMMU driver removes the PASID table entry and invalidates the IOTLBs. * mm_free(): free a structure allocated by mm_alloc(), and let arch release the process. mm_attach and mm_detach operations are serialized with a spinlock. At the moment it is global, but if we try to optimize it, the core should at least prevent concurrent attach()/detach() on the same domain (so multi-level PASID table code can allocate tables lazily). mm_alloc() can sleep, but mm_free must not (because we'll have to call it from call_srcu later on.) At the moment we use an IDR for allocating PASIDs and retrieving contexts. We also use a single spinlock. These can be refined and optimized later (a custom allocator will be needed for top-down PASID allocation). Keeping track of address spaces requires the use of MMU notifiers. Handling process exit with regard to unbind() is tricky, so it is left for another patch and we explicitly fail mm_alloc() for the moment. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> --- drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 382 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 + include/linux/iommu.h | 25 +++ 3 files changed, 406 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c index 593685d891bf..f9af9d66b3ed 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c @@ -7,11 +7,321 @@ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> + +/** + * DOC: io_mm model + * + * The io_mm keeps track of process address spaces shared between CPU and IOMMU. + * The following example illustrates the relation between structures + * iommu_domain, io_mm and iommu_bond. An iommu_bond is a link between io_mm and + * device. A device can have multiple io_mm and an io_mm may be bound to + * multiple devices. + * ___________________________ + * | IOMMU domain A | + * | ________________ | + * | | IOMMU group | +------- io_pgtables + * | | | | + * | | dev 00:00.0 ----+------- bond --- io_mm X + * | |________________| \ | + * | '----- bond ---. + * |___________________________| \ + * ___________________________ \ + * | IOMMU domain B | io_mm Y + * | ________________ | / / + * | | IOMMU group | | / / + * | | | | / / + * | | dev 00:01.0 ------------ bond -' / + * | | dev 00:01.1 ------------ bond --' + * | |________________| | + * | +------- io_pgtables + * |___________________________| + * + * In this example, device 00:00.0 is in domain A, devices 00:01.* are in domain + * B. All devices within the same domain access the same address spaces. Device + * 00:00.0 accesses address spaces X and Y, each corresponding to an mm_struct. + * Devices 00:01.* only access address space Y. In addition each + * IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA domain has a private address space, io_pgtable, that is + * managed with iommu_map()/iommu_unmap(), and isn't shared with the CPU MMU. + * + * To obtain the above configuration, users would for instance issue the + * following calls: + * + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:00.0, mm X, ...) -> PASID 1 + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:00.0, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:01.0, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:01.1, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 + * + * A single Process Address Space ID (PASID) is allocated for each mm. In the + * example, devices use PASID 1 to read/write into address space X and PASID 2 + * to read/write into address space Y. + * + * Hardware tables describing this configuration in the IOMMU would typically + * look like this: + * + * PASID tables + * of domain A + * .->+--------+ + * / 0 | |-------> io_pgtable + * / +--------+ + * Device tables / 1 | |-------> pgd X + * +--------+ / +--------+ + * 00:00.0 | A |-' 2 | |--. + * +--------+ +--------+ \ + * : : 3 | | \ + * +--------+ +--------+ --> pgd Y + * 00:01.0 | B |--. / + * +--------+ \ | + * 00:01.1 | B |----+ PASID tables | + * +--------+ \ of domain B | + * '->+--------+ | + * 0 | |-- | --> io_pgtable + * +--------+ | + * 1 | | | + * +--------+ | + * 2 | |---' + * +--------+ + * 3 | | + * +--------+ + * + * With this model, a single call binds all devices in a given domain to an + * address space. Other devices in the domain will get the same bond implicitly. + * However, users must issue one bind() for each device, because IOMMUs may + * implement SVA differently. Furthermore, mandating one bind() per device + * allows the driver to perform sanity-checks on device capabilities. + * + * On Arm and AMD IOMMUs, entry 0 of the PASID table can be used to hold + * non-PASID translations. In this case PASID 0 is reserved and entry 0 points + * to the io_pgtable base. On Intel IOMMU, the io_pgtable base would be held in + * the device table and PASID 0 would be available to the allocator. + */ /* TODO: stub for the fault queue. Remove later. */ #define iommu_fault_queue_flush(...) +struct iommu_bond { + struct io_mm *io_mm; + struct device *dev; + struct iommu_domain *domain; + + struct list_head mm_head; + struct list_head dev_head; + struct list_head domain_head; + + void *drvdata; + + /* Number of bind() calls */ + refcount_t refs; +}; + +/* + * Because we're using an IDR, PASIDs are limited to 31 bits (the sign bit is + * used for returning errors). In practice implementations will use at most 20 + * bits, which is the PCI limit. + */ +static DEFINE_IDR(iommu_pasid_idr); + +/* + * For the moment this is an all-purpose lock. It serializes + * access/modifications to bonds, access/modifications to the PASID IDR, and + * changes to io_mm refcount as well. + */ +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iommu_sva_lock); + +static struct io_mm * +io_mm_alloc(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, + struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + int ret; + int pasid; + struct io_mm *io_mm; + struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; + + if (!dev_param || !domain->ops->mm_alloc || !domain->ops->mm_free) + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + + io_mm = domain->ops->mm_alloc(domain, mm); + if (IS_ERR(io_mm)) + return io_mm; + if (!io_mm) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + /* + * The mm must not be freed until after the driver frees the io_mm + * (which may involve unpinning the CPU ASID for instance, requiring a + * valid mm struct.) + */ + mmgrab(mm); + + io_mm->mm = mm; + io_mm->release = domain->ops->mm_free; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io_mm->devices); + + idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + pasid = idr_alloc_cyclic(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, dev_param->min_pasid, + dev_param->max_pasid + 1, GFP_ATOMIC); + io_mm->pasid = pasid; + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + idr_preload_end(); + + if (pasid < 0) { + ret = pasid; + goto err_free_mm; + } + + /* TODO: keep track of mm. For the moment, abort. */ + ret = -ENOSYS; + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + idr_remove(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm->pasid); + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + +err_free_mm: + domain->ops->mm_free(io_mm); + mmdrop(mm); + + return ERR_PTR(ret); +} + +static void io_mm_free(struct io_mm *io_mm) +{ + struct mm_struct *mm; + void (*release)(struct io_mm *); + + release = io_mm->release; + mm = io_mm->mm; + + release(io_mm); + mmdrop(mm); +} + +static void io_mm_release(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct io_mm *io_mm; + + io_mm = container_of(kref, struct io_mm, kref); + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&io_mm->devices)); + + idr_remove(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm->pasid); + + io_mm_free(io_mm); +} + +/* + * Returns non-zero if a reference to the io_mm was successfully taken. + * Returns zero if the io_mm is being freed and should not be used. + */ +static int io_mm_get_locked(struct io_mm *io_mm) +{ + if (io_mm) + return kref_get_unless_zero(&io_mm->kref); + + return 0; +} + +static void io_mm_put_locked(struct io_mm *io_mm) +{ + kref_put(&io_mm->kref, io_mm_release); +} + +static void io_mm_put(struct io_mm *io_mm) +{ + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); +} + +static int io_mm_attach(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, + struct io_mm *io_mm, void *drvdata) +{ + int ret; + bool attach_domain = true; + int pasid = io_mm->pasid; + struct iommu_bond *bond, *tmp; + struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; + + if (!dev_param) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!domain->ops->mm_attach || !domain->ops->mm_detach) + return -ENODEV; + + if (pasid > dev_param->max_pasid || pasid < dev_param->min_pasid) + return -ERANGE; + + bond = kzalloc(sizeof(*bond), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!bond) + return -ENOMEM; + + bond->domain = domain; + bond->io_mm = io_mm; + bond->dev = dev; + bond->drvdata = drvdata; + refcount_set(&bond->refs, 1); + + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + /* + * Check if this io_mm is already bound to the domain. In which case the + * IOMMU driver doesn't have to install the PASID table entry. + */ + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &domain->mm_list, domain_head) { + if (tmp->io_mm == io_mm) { + attach_domain = false; + break; + } + } + + ret = domain->ops->mm_attach(domain, dev, io_mm, attach_domain); + if (ret) { + kfree(bond); + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + return ret; + } + + list_add(&bond->mm_head, &io_mm->devices); + list_add(&bond->domain_head, &domain->mm_list); + list_add(&bond->dev_head, &dev_param->mm_list); + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + + return 0; +} + +static bool io_mm_detach_locked(struct iommu_bond *bond) +{ + struct iommu_bond *tmp; + bool detach_domain = true; + struct iommu_domain *domain = bond->domain; + + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&bond->refs)) + return false; + + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &domain->mm_list, domain_head) { + if (tmp->io_mm == bond->io_mm && tmp->dev != bond->dev) { + detach_domain = false; + break; + } + } + + domain->ops->mm_detach(domain, bond->dev, bond->io_mm, detach_domain); + + list_del(&bond->mm_head); + list_del(&bond->domain_head); + list_del(&bond->dev_head); + io_mm_put_locked(bond->io_mm); + + kfree(bond); + + return true; +} + +static void io_mm_detach_all_locked(struct iommu_bond *bond) +{ + while (!io_mm_detach_locked(bond)); +} + /** * iommu_sva_device_init() - Initialize Shared Virtual Addressing for a device * @dev: the device @@ -129,7 +439,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_device_shutdown); int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, unsigned long flags, void *drvdata) { + int i, ret; + struct io_mm *io_mm = NULL; struct iommu_domain *domain; + struct iommu_bond *bond = NULL, *tmp; struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); @@ -145,7 +458,42 @@ int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, if (flags != (IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID | IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF)) return -EINVAL; - return -ENOSYS; /* TODO */ + /* If an io_mm already exists, use it */ + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + idr_for_each_entry(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, i) { + if (io_mm->mm != mm || !io_mm_get_locked(io_mm)) + continue; + + /* Is it already bound to this device? */ + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { + if (tmp->dev != dev) + continue; + + bond = tmp; + refcount_inc(&bond->refs); + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); + break; + } + break; + } + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + + if (bond) + return 0; + + if (!io_mm) { + io_mm = io_mm_alloc(domain, dev, mm); + if (IS_ERR(io_mm)) + return PTR_ERR(io_mm); + } + + ret = io_mm_attach(domain, dev, io_mm, drvdata); + if (ret) + io_mm_put(io_mm); + else + *pasid = io_mm->pasid; + + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_bind_device); @@ -165,7 +513,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_bind_device); */ int iommu_sva_unbind_device(struct device *dev, int pasid) { + int ret = -ESRCH; + struct io_mm *io_mm; struct iommu_domain *domain; + struct iommu_bond *bond = NULL; domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); if (WARN_ON(!domain)) @@ -177,7 +528,23 @@ int iommu_sva_unbind_device(struct device *dev, int pasid) */ iommu_fault_queue_flush(dev); - return -ENOSYS; /* TODO */ + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + io_mm = idr_find(&iommu_pasid_idr, pasid); + if (!io_mm) { + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + return -ESRCH; + } + + list_for_each_entry(bond, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { + if (bond->dev == dev) { + io_mm_detach_locked(bond); + ret = 0; + break; + } + } + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); + + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_unbind_device); @@ -188,8 +555,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_unbind_device); */ void __iommu_sva_unbind_dev_all(struct device *dev) { + struct iommu_bond *bond, *next; + struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; + + if (!dev_param) + return; + iommu_fault_queue_flush(dev); - /* TODO */ + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(bond, next, &dev_param->mm_list, dev_head) + io_mm_detach_all_locked(bond); + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__iommu_sva_unbind_dev_all); diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c index f977851c522b..1d60b32a6744 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c @@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev) ret = -ENOMEM; goto err_free_name; } + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->iommu_param->mm_list); kobject_get(group->devices_kobj); @@ -1325,6 +1326,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_domain_alloc(struct bus_type *bus, domain->type = type; /* Assume all sizes by default; the driver may override this later */ domain->pgsize_bitmap = bus->iommu_ops->pgsize_bitmap; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->mm_list); return domain; } diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index 1fb10d64b9e5..09d85f44142a 100644 --- a/include/linux/iommu.h +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ struct iommu_domain { void *handler_token; struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry; void *iova_cookie; + + struct list_head mm_list; +}; + +struct io_mm { + int pasid; + struct list_head devices; + struct kref kref; + struct mm_struct *mm; + + /* Release callback for this mm */ + void (*release)(struct io_mm *io_mm); }; enum iommu_cap { @@ -204,6 +216,11 @@ struct page_response_msg { * @detach_dev: detach device from an iommu domain * @sva_device_init: initialize Shared Virtual Adressing for a device * @sva_device_shutdown: shutdown Shared Virtual Adressing for a device + * @mm_alloc: allocate io_mm + * @mm_free: free io_mm + * @mm_attach: attach io_mm to a device. Install PASID entry if necessary + * @mm_detach: detach io_mm from a device. Remove PASID entry and + * flush associated TLB entries. * @map: map a physically contiguous memory region to an iommu domain * @unmap: unmap a physically contiguous memory region from an iommu domain * @map_sg: map a scatter-gather list of physically contiguous memory chunks @@ -241,6 +258,13 @@ struct iommu_ops { unsigned int *min_pasid, unsigned int *max_pasid); void (*sva_device_shutdown)(struct device *dev); + struct io_mm *(*mm_alloc)(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct mm_struct *mm); + void (*mm_free)(struct io_mm *io_mm); + int (*mm_attach)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, + struct io_mm *io_mm, bool attach_domain); + void (*mm_detach)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, + struct io_mm *io_mm, bool detach_domain); int (*map)(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot); size_t (*unmap)(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, @@ -399,6 +423,7 @@ struct iommu_param { unsigned long sva_features; unsigned int min_pasid; unsigned int max_pasid; + struct list_head mm_list; }; int iommu_device_register(struct iommu_device *iommu); -- 2.15.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu 2018-03-01 8:04 ` Christian König 2018-03-02 16:19 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-05 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Lu Baolu @ 2018-03-01 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: mark.rutland, ilias.apalodimas, catalin.marinas, xuzaibo, will.deacon, okaya, ashok.raj, bharatku, rfranz, lenb, robh+dt, bhelgaas, shunyong.yang, dwmw2, rjw, sudeep.holla, christian.koenig Hi Jean, On 02/13/2018 02:33 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Introduce boilerplate code for allocating IOMMU mm structures and binding > them to devices. Four operations are added to IOMMU drivers: > > * mm_alloc(): to create an io_mm structure and perform architecture- > specific operations required to grab the process (for instance on ARM, > pin down the CPU ASID so that the process doesn't get assigned a new > ASID on rollover). > > There is a single valid io_mm structure per Linux mm. Future extensions > may also use io_mm for kernel-managed address spaces, populated with > map()/unmap() calls instead of bound to process address spaces. This > patch focuses on "shared" io_mm. > > * mm_attach(): attach an mm to a device. The IOMMU driver checks that the > device is capable of sharing an address space, and writes the PASID > table entry to install the pgd. > > Some IOMMU drivers will have a single PASID table per domain, for > convenience. Other can implement it differently but to help these > drivers, mm_attach and mm_detach take 'attach_domain' and > 'detach_domain' parameters, that tell whether they need to set and clear > the PASID entry or only send the required TLB invalidations. > > * mm_detach(): detach an mm from a device. The IOMMU driver removes the > PASID table entry and invalidates the IOTLBs. > > * mm_free(): free a structure allocated by mm_alloc(), and let arch > release the process. > > mm_attach and mm_detach operations are serialized with a spinlock. At the > moment it is global, but if we try to optimize it, the core should at > least prevent concurrent attach()/detach() on the same domain (so > multi-level PASID table code can allocate tables lazily). mm_alloc() can > sleep, but mm_free must not (because we'll have to call it from call_srcu > later on.) > > At the moment we use an IDR for allocating PASIDs and retrieving contexts. > We also use a single spinlock. These can be refined and optimized later (a > custom allocator will be needed for top-down PASID allocation). > > Keeping track of address spaces requires the use of MMU notifiers. > Handling process exit with regard to unbind() is tricky, so it is left for > another patch and we explicitly fail mm_alloc() for the moment. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 382 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 + > include/linux/iommu.h | 25 +++ > 3 files changed, 406 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > index 593685d891bf..f9af9d66b3ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c > @@ -7,11 +7,321 @@ > * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > */ > > +#include <linux/idr.h> > #include <linux/iommu.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h> > + > +/** > + * DOC: io_mm model > + * > + * The io_mm keeps track of process address spaces shared between CPU and IOMMU. > + * The following example illustrates the relation between structures > + * iommu_domain, io_mm and iommu_bond. An iommu_bond is a link between io_mm and > + * device. A device can have multiple io_mm and an io_mm may be bound to > + * multiple devices. > + * ___________________________ > + * | IOMMU domain A | > + * | ________________ | > + * | | IOMMU group | +------- io_pgtables > + * | | | | > + * | | dev 00:00.0 ----+------- bond --- io_mm X > + * | |________________| \ | > + * | '----- bond ---. > + * |___________________________| \ > + * ___________________________ \ > + * | IOMMU domain B | io_mm Y > + * | ________________ | / / > + * | | IOMMU group | | / / > + * | | | | / / > + * | | dev 00:01.0 ------------ bond -' / > + * | | dev 00:01.1 ------------ bond --' > + * | |________________| | > + * | +------- io_pgtables > + * |___________________________| > + * > + * In this example, device 00:00.0 is in domain A, devices 00:01.* are in domain > + * B. All devices within the same domain access the same address spaces. Device > + * 00:00.0 accesses address spaces X and Y, each corresponding to an mm_struct. > + * Devices 00:01.* only access address space Y. In addition each > + * IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA domain has a private address space, io_pgtable, that is > + * managed with iommu_map()/iommu_unmap(), and isn't shared with the CPU MMU. > + * > + * To obtain the above configuration, users would for instance issue the > + * following calls: > + * > + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:00.0, mm X, ...) -> PASID 1 > + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:00.0, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 > + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:01.0, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 > + * iommu_sva_bind_device(dev 00:01.1, mm Y, ...) -> PASID 2 > + * > + * A single Process Address Space ID (PASID) is allocated for each mm. In the > + * example, devices use PASID 1 to read/write into address space X and PASID 2 > + * to read/write into address space Y. > + * > + * Hardware tables describing this configuration in the IOMMU would typically > + * look like this: > + * > + * PASID tables > + * of domain A > + * .->+--------+ > + * / 0 | |-------> io_pgtable > + * / +--------+ > + * Device tables / 1 | |-------> pgd X > + * +--------+ / +--------+ > + * 00:00.0 | A |-' 2 | |--. > + * +--------+ +--------+ \ > + * : : 3 | | \ > + * +--------+ +--------+ --> pgd Y > + * 00:01.0 | B |--. / > + * +--------+ \ | > + * 00:01.1 | B |----+ PASID tables | > + * +--------+ \ of domain B | > + * '->+--------+ | > + * 0 | |-- | --> io_pgtable > + * +--------+ | > + * 1 | | | > + * +--------+ | > + * 2 | |---' > + * +--------+ > + * 3 | | > + * +--------+ > + * > + * With this model, a single call binds all devices in a given domain to an > + * address space. Other devices in the domain will get the same bond implicitly. > + * However, users must issue one bind() for each device, because IOMMUs may > + * implement SVA differently. Furthermore, mandating one bind() per device > + * allows the driver to perform sanity-checks on device capabilities. > + * > + * On Arm and AMD IOMMUs, entry 0 of the PASID table can be used to hold > + * non-PASID translations. In this case PASID 0 is reserved and entry 0 points > + * to the io_pgtable base. On Intel IOMMU, the io_pgtable base would be held in > + * the device table and PASID 0 would be available to the allocator. > + */ > > /* TODO: stub for the fault queue. Remove later. */ > #define iommu_fault_queue_flush(...) > > +struct iommu_bond { > + struct io_mm *io_mm; > + struct device *dev; > + struct iommu_domain *domain; > + > + struct list_head mm_head; > + struct list_head dev_head; > + struct list_head domain_head; > + > + void *drvdata; > + > + /* Number of bind() calls */ > + refcount_t refs; > +}; > + > +/* > + * Because we're using an IDR, PASIDs are limited to 31 bits (the sign bit is > + * used for returning errors). In practice implementations will use at most 20 > + * bits, which is the PCI limit. > + */ > +static DEFINE_IDR(iommu_pasid_idr); > + > +/* > + * For the moment this is an all-purpose lock. It serializes > + * access/modifications to bonds, access/modifications to the PASID IDR, and > + * changes to io_mm refcount as well. > + */ > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iommu_sva_lock); > + > +static struct io_mm * > +io_mm_alloc(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, > + struct mm_struct *mm) > +{ > + int ret; > + int pasid; > + struct io_mm *io_mm; > + struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; > + > + if (!dev_param || !domain->ops->mm_alloc || !domain->ops->mm_free) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + io_mm = domain->ops->mm_alloc(domain, mm); > + if (IS_ERR(io_mm)) > + return io_mm; > + if (!io_mm) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + /* > + * The mm must not be freed until after the driver frees the io_mm > + * (which may involve unpinning the CPU ASID for instance, requiring a > + * valid mm struct.) > + */ > + mmgrab(mm); > + > + io_mm->mm = mm; > + io_mm->release = domain->ops->mm_free; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&io_mm->devices); > + > + idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); > + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); > + pasid = idr_alloc_cyclic(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, dev_param->min_pasid, > + dev_param->max_pasid + 1, GFP_ATOMIC); Can the pasid management code be moved into a common library? PASID is not stick to SVA. An IOMMU model device could be designed to use PASID for second level translation (classical DMA translation) as well. Best regards, Lu Baolu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu @ 2018-03-01 8:04 ` Christian König 2018-03-02 16:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-02 16:19 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Christian König @ 2018-03-01 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lu Baolu, Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: mark.rutland, ilias.apalodimas, catalin.marinas, xuzaibo, will.deacon, okaya, ashok.raj, bharatku, rfranz, lenb, robh+dt, bhelgaas, shunyong.yang, dwmw2, rjw, sudeep.holla Am 01.03.2018 um 07:52 schrieb Lu Baolu: > Hi Jean, > > On 02/13/2018 02:33 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> [SNIP] >> + pasid = idr_alloc_cyclic(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, dev_param->min_pasid, >> + dev_param->max_pasid + 1, GFP_ATOMIC); > Can the pasid management code be moved into a common library? > PASID is not stick to SVA. An IOMMU model device could be designed > to use PASID for second level translation (classical DMA translation) > as well. Yeah, we have the same problem on amdgpu. We assign PASIDs to clients even when IOMMU isn't present in the system just because we need it for debugging. E.g. when the hardware detects that some shader program is doing something nasty we get the PASID in the interrupt and could for example use it to inform the client about the fault. Regards, Christian. > > Best regards, > Lu Baolu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-03-01 8:04 ` Christian König @ 2018-03-02 16:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-02 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian König, Lu Baolu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland, bharatku@xilinx.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, Catalin Marinas, xuzaibo@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Sudeep Holla, rfranz@cavium.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org T24gMDEvMDMvMTggMDg6MDQsIENocmlzdGlhbiBLw7ZuaWcgd3JvdGU6Cj4gQW0gMDEuMDMuMjAx OCB1bSAwNzo1MiBzY2hyaWViIEx1IEJhb2x1Ogo+PiBIaSBKZWFuLAo+Pgo+PiBPbiAwMi8xMy8y MDE4IDAyOjMzIEFNLCBKZWFuLVBoaWxpcHBlIEJydWNrZXIgd3JvdGU6Cj4+PiBbU05JUF0KPj4+ ICsJcGFzaWQgPSBpZHJfYWxsb2NfY3ljbGljKCZpb21tdV9wYXNpZF9pZHIsIGlvX21tLCBkZXZf cGFyYW0tPm1pbl9wYXNpZCwKPj4+ICsJCQkJIGRldl9wYXJhbS0+bWF4X3Bhc2lkICsgMSwgR0ZQ X0FUT01JQyk7Cj4+IENhbiB0aGUgcGFzaWQgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBjb2RlIGJlIG1vdmVkIGludG8g YSBjb21tb24gbGlicmFyeT8KPj4gUEFTSUQgaXMgbm90IHN0aWNrIHRvIFNWQS4gQW4gSU9NTVUg bW9kZWwgZGV2aWNlIGNvdWxkIGJlIGRlc2lnbmVkCj4+IHRvIHVzZSBQQVNJRCBmb3Igc2Vjb25k IGxldmVsIHRyYW5zbGF0aW9uIChjbGFzc2ljYWwgRE1BIHRyYW5zbGF0aW9uKQo+PiBhcyB3ZWxs Lgo+IAo+IFllYWgsIHdlIGhhdmUgdGhlIHNhbWUgcHJvYmxlbSBvbiBhbWRncHUuCj4gCj4gV2Ug YXNzaWduIFBBU0lEcyB0byBjbGllbnRzIGV2ZW4gd2hlbiBJT01NVSBpc24ndCBwcmVzZW50IGlu IHRoZSBzeXN0ZW0gCj4ganVzdCBiZWNhdXNlIHdlIG5lZWQgaXQgZm9yIGRlYnVnZ2luZy4KPiAK PiBFLmcuIHdoZW4gdGhlIGhhcmR3YXJlIGRldGVjdHMgdGhhdCBzb21lIHNoYWRlciBwcm9ncmFt IGlzIGRvaW5nIAo+IHNvbWV0aGluZyBuYXN0eSB3ZSBnZXQgdGhlIFBBU0lEIGluIHRoZSBpbnRl cnJ1cHQgYW5kIGNvdWxkIGZvciBleGFtcGxlIAo+IHVzZSBpdCB0byBpbmZvcm0gdGhlIGNsaWVu dCBhYm91dCB0aGUgZmF1bHQuCgpUaGlzIHNlZW1zIGxpa2UgYSBuZXcgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnQgYWx0 b2dldGhlciwgYW5kIGEgYml0IG91dHNpZGUgdGhlCnNjb3BlIG9mIHRoaXMgc2VyaWVzIHRvIGJl IGhvbmVzdC4gSXMgdGhlIGNsaWVudCB1c2Vyc3BhY2UgaW4gdGhpcwpjb250ZXh0PyBJIGd1ZXNz IGl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIG1vc3RseSBmb3IgcHJvdG90eXBpbmcgdGhlbj8gT3RoZXJ3aXNlIHlvdQpw cm9iYWJseSBkb24ndCB3YW50IHRvIGhhbmQgR1BVIGNvbnRleHRzIHRvIHVzZXJzcGFjZSB3aXRo b3V0IGFuIElPTU1VCmlzb2xhdGluZyB0aGVtPwoKSWYgeW91IGRvbid0IG5lZWQgbW0gdHJhY2tp bmcvc2hhcmluZyBvciBpb21tdV9tYXAvdW5tYXAsIHRoZW4gbWF5YmUgYW4KSURSIHByaXZhdGUg dG8gdGhlIEdQVSBkcml2ZXIgd291bGQgYmUgZW5vdWdoPyBJZiB5b3UgZG8gbmVlZCBtbQp0cmFj a2luZywgSSBzdXBwb3NlIHdlIGNvdWxkIG1vZGlmeSBpb21tdV9zdmFfYmluZCgpIHRvIGFsbG9j YXRlIGFuZAp0cmFjayBpb19tbSBldmVuIGlmIHRoZSBnaXZlbiBkZXZpY2UgZG9lc24ndCBoYXZl IGFuIElPTU1VLCBidXQgaXQgc2VlbXMKYSBiaXQgYmFja3dhcmQuCgpUaGFua3MsCkplYW4KCl9f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmxpbnV4LWFybS1r ZXJuZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CmxpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJuZWxAbGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZwpo dHRwOi8vbGlzdHMuaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2xpbnV4LWFybS1rZXJu ZWwK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu 2018-03-01 8:04 ` Christian König @ 2018-03-02 16:19 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-02 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lu Baolu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland, bharatku@xilinx.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, Catalin Marinas, xuzaibo@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, Will Deacon, okaya@codeaurora.org, bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Sudeep Holla, rfranz@cavium.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, christian.koenig@amd.com, lenb@kernel.org On 01/03/18 06:52, Lu Baolu wrote: > Can the pasid management code be moved into a common library? > PASID is not stick to SVA. An IOMMU model device could be designed > to use PASID for second level translation (classical DMA translation) > as well. What do you mean by second level translation? Do you see a use-case with nesting translation within the host? I agree that PASID + classical DMA is desirable. A device driver would allocate PASIDs and perform iommu_sva_map(domain, pasid, iova, pa, size, prot) and iommu_sva_unmap(domain, pasid, iova, size). I'm hoping that we can also augment the DMA API with PASIDs, and that a driver can use both shared and private contexts simultaneously. So that it can use a few PASIDs for management purpose, and assign the rest to userspace. The intent is for iommu-sva.c to be this common library. Work for "private" PASID allocation is underway, see Jordan Crouse's series posted last week https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg635857.html Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu @ 2018-03-05 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-03-06 10:37 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-10 18:53 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-04-24 1:32 ` Sinan Kaya 3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-03-05 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: joro, robh+dt, mark.rutland, catalin.marinas, will.deacon, lorenzo.pieralisi, hanjun.guo, sudeep.holla, rjw, lenb, robin.murphy, bhelgaas, alex.williamson, tn, liubo95, thunder.leizhen, xieyisheng1, xuzaibo, ilias.apalodimas, jonathan.cameron, shunyong.yang, nwatters, jcrouse, rfranz, dwmw2, jacob.jun.pan, yi.l.liu, ashok.raj, robdclark, christian.koenig, bharatku On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > +static void io_mm_free(struct io_mm *io_mm) > +{ > + struct mm_struct *mm; > + void (*release)(struct io_mm *); > + > + release = io_mm->release; > + mm = io_mm->mm; > + > + release(io_mm); Is there any reason why you can't call iommu->release() here directly? Why do you need the release local variable? > + mmdrop(mm); > +} > + -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-03-05 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya @ 2018-03-06 10:37 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-03-06 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sinan Kaya, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Lorenzo Pieralisi, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, Robin Murphy, bhelgaas@google.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, tn@semihalf.com, liubo95@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, xieyisheng1@huawei.com, xuzaibo@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, rfranz@cavium.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, robdclark@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, bharatku@xilinx.com On 05/03/18 15:28, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> +static void io_mm_free(struct io_mm *io_mm) >> +{ >> + struct mm_struct *mm; >> + void (*release)(struct io_mm *); >> + >> + release = io_mm->release; >> + mm = io_mm->mm; >> + >> + release(io_mm); > > Is there any reason why you can't call iommu->release() > here directly? Why do you need the release local variable? I think I can remove the local variable Thanks, Jean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu 2018-03-05 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-10 18:53 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-04-13 10:59 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-24 1:32 ` Sinan Kaya 3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-10 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: mark.rutland, xieyisheng1, ilias.apalodimas, catalin.marinas, xuzaibo, jonathan.cameron, will.deacon, yi.l.liu, lorenzo.pieralisi, ashok.raj, tn, joro, bharatku, rfranz, lenb, jacob.jun.pan, alex.williamson, robh+dt, thunder.leizhen, bhelgaas, shunyong.yang, dwmw2, liubo95, rjw, jcrouse, robdclark, hanjun.guo, sudeep.holla, robin.murphy, christian.koenig, nwatters On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > +static void io_mm_detach_all_locked(struct iommu_bond *bond) > +{ > + while (!io_mm_detach_locked(bond)); > +} > + I don't remember if I mentioned this before or not but I think this loop needs a little bit relaxation with yield and maybe an informational message with might help if wait exceeds some time. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-04-10 18:53 ` Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-13 10:59 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-04-13 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sinan Kaya, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Lorenzo Pieralisi, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, Robin Murphy, bhelgaas@google.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, tn@semihalf.com, liubo95@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, xieyisheng1@huawei.com, xuzaibo@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, rfranz@cavium.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, robdclark@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, bharatku@xilinx.com On 10/04/18 19:53, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> +static void io_mm_detach_all_locked(struct iommu_bond *bond) >> +{ >> + while (!io_mm_detach_locked(bond)); >> +} >> + > > I don't remember if I mentioned this before or not but I think this loop > needs a little bit relaxation with yield and maybe an informational message > with might help if wait exceeds some time. Right, at the very least we should have a cpu_relax here. I think this bit is going away, though, because I want to lift the possibility of calling bind() for the same dev/mm pair multiple times. It's not useful in my opinion because that call could only be issued by a given driver. Thanks, Jean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2018-04-10 18:53 ` Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-24 1:32 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-04-24 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-24 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-acpi, devicetree, iommu, kvm Cc: mark.rutland, xieyisheng1, ilias.apalodimas, catalin.marinas, xuzaibo, jonathan.cameron, will.deacon, yi.l.liu, lorenzo.pieralisi, ashok.raj, tn, joro, bharatku, rfranz, lenb, jacob.jun.pan, alex.williamson, robh+dt, thunder.leizhen, bhelgaas, shunyong.yang, dwmw2, liubo95, rjw, jcrouse, robdclark, hanjun.guo, sudeep.holla, robin.murphy, christian.koenig, nwatters On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > /** > * iommu_sva_device_init() - Initialize Shared Virtual Addressing for a device > * @dev: the device > @@ -129,7 +439,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_device_shutdown); > int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, > unsigned long flags, void *drvdata) > { > + int i, ret; > + struct io_mm *io_mm = NULL; > struct iommu_domain *domain; > + struct iommu_bond *bond = NULL, *tmp; > struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; > > domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); > @@ -145,7 +458,42 @@ int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, > if (flags != (IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID | IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF)) > return -EINVAL; > > - return -ENOSYS; /* TODO */ > + /* If an io_mm already exists, use it */ > + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); > + idr_for_each_entry(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, i) { > + if (io_mm->mm != mm || !io_mm_get_locked(io_mm)) > + continue; > + > + /* Is it already bound to this device? */ > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { > + if (tmp->dev != dev) > + continue; > + > + bond = tmp; > + refcount_inc(&bond->refs); > + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); > + break; > + } > + break; > + } > + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > + > + if (bond) Please return pasid when you find an io_mm that is already bound. Something like *pasid = io_mm->pasid should do the work here when bond is true. > + return 0; -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-04-24 1:32 ` Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-24 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-24 17:17 ` Sinan Kaya 0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-04-24 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sinan Kaya, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland, xieyisheng1@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, Catalin Marinas, xuzaibo@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, Will Deacon, yi.l.liu@intel.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi, ashok.raj@intel.com, tn@semihalf.com, joro@8bytes.org, bharatku@xilinx.com, rfranz@cavium.com, lenb@kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, liubo95@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, robdclark@gmail.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, Robin Murphy, christian.koenig@amd.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org On 24/04/18 02:32, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> /** >> * iommu_sva_device_init() - Initialize Shared Virtual Addressing for a device >> * @dev: the device >> @@ -129,7 +439,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_device_shutdown); >> int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, >> unsigned long flags, void *drvdata) >> { >> + int i, ret; >> + struct io_mm *io_mm = NULL; >> struct iommu_domain *domain; >> + struct iommu_bond *bond = NULL, *tmp; >> struct iommu_param *dev_param = dev->iommu_param; >> >> domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); >> @@ -145,7 +458,42 @@ int iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, int *pasid, >> if (flags != (IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_PASID | IOMMU_SVA_FEAT_IOPF)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> - return -ENOSYS; /* TODO */ >> + /* If an io_mm already exists, use it */ >> + spin_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); >> + idr_for_each_entry(&iommu_pasid_idr, io_mm, i) { >> + if (io_mm->mm != mm || !io_mm_get_locked(io_mm)) >> + continue; >> + >> + /* Is it already bound to this device? */ >> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { >> + if (tmp->dev != dev) >> + continue; >> + >> + bond = tmp; >> + refcount_inc(&bond->refs); >> + io_mm_put_locked(io_mm); >> + break; >> + } >> + break; >> + } >> + spin_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); >> + >> + if (bond) > > Please return pasid when you find an io_mm that is already bound. Something like > *pasid = io_mm->pasid should do the work here when bond is true. Right. I think we should also keep returning 0, not switch to -EEXIST or similar. So in next version a driver can call bind(devX, mmY) multiple times, but the first unbind() removes the bond. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces 2018-04-24 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker @ 2018-04-24 17:17 ` Sinan Kaya 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-04-24 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean-Philippe Brucker, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Lorenzo Pieralisi, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Sudeep Holla, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, Robin Murphy, bhelgaas@google.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, tn@semihalf.com, liubo95@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, xieyisheng1@huawei.com, xuzaibo@huawei.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com, nwatters@codeaurora.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org, rfranz@cavium.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, robdclark@gmail.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, bharatku@xilinx.com On 4/24/2018 5:33 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> Please return pasid when you find an io_mm that is already bound. Something like >> *pasid = io_mm->pasid should do the work here when bond is true. > Right. I think we should also keep returning 0, not switch to -EEXIST or > similar. So in next version a driver can call bind(devX, mmY) multiple > times, but the first unbind() removes the bond. If we are going to allow multiple binds, then the last unbind should remove the bond rather than the first one via reference counting. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-24 17:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <1519280641-30258-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-3-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> 2018-02-22 9:03 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Yisheng Xie 2018-02-22 13:17 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-37-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> 2018-03-19 9:47 ` [PATCH 37/37] vfio: Add support for Shared Virtual Addressing Yisheng Xie 2018-03-21 13:40 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [not found] ` <1519280641-30258-27-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> 2018-03-19 11:03 ` [PATCH 27/37] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Register fault workqueue Yisheng Xie 2018-03-21 13:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-22 1:09 ` Yisheng Xie 2018-04-04 10:13 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-02-12 18:33 [PATCH 00/37] Shared Virtual Addressing for the IOMMU Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-02-12 18:33 ` [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-01 6:52 ` Lu Baolu 2018-03-01 8:04 ` Christian König 2018-03-02 16:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-02 16:19 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-03-05 15:28 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-03-06 10:37 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-10 18:53 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-04-13 10:59 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-24 1:32 ` Sinan Kaya 2018-04-24 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker 2018-04-24 17:17 ` Sinan Kaya
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).