Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material

[Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>]

Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:30:53PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:10:00AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Collection of DOE material, v2:
> > 
> > Do you envision getting acks from the CXL folks and
> > merging via the PCI tree, or the reverse?
> 
> I do not have a strong preference myself.
> 
> I've just submitted v3 and based that on pci/next.
> 
> The patches apply equally well to cxl/next, save for a trivial conflict
> in patch [13/16] due to a context change in drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h.
> (I'm removing "struct xarray doe_mbs" and an adjacent new line was
> added in cxl/next for "struct cxl_event_state event".)
> 
> I recognize that it might be too late to squeeze the full series into 6.3.
> However, the first 6 patches are fixes tagged for stable, so at least
> those should still be fine for 6.3.
> 
> I believe Dave Jiang is basing his in-kernel CDAT parsing on this series,
> hence needs it merged during the next cycle.  So if you do not want to
> apply the full series for 6.3, then the last 10 patches should probably
> be picked up by Dan for 6.4 early during the next cycle in support of
> Dave.
> 
> All of those ruminations are moot of couse if there are objections
> requiring another respin.
> 
> Dan, what do you think?

I am ok for this to go through PCI. I will go review v3.