linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] cxl/pci: Rightsize CDAT response allocation
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:56:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63ed7f50ed22b_19cbb72946d@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49c5299afc660ac33fee9a116ea37df0de938432.1676043318.git.lukas@wunner.de>

Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Jonathan notes that cxl_cdat_get_length() and cxl_cdat_read_table()
> allocate 32 dwords for the DOE response even though it may be smaller.
> 
> In the case of cxl_cdat_get_length(), only the second dword of the
> response is of interest (it contains the length).  So reduce the
> allocation to 2 dwords and let DOE discard the remainder.
> 
> In the case of cxl_cdat_read_table(), a correctly sized allocation for
> the full CDAT already exists.  Let DOE write each table entry directly
> into that allocation.  There's a snag in that the table entry is
> preceded by a Table Access Response Header (1 dword).

Where is this 'Table Access Response Header' defined?

Ira

> Save the last
> dword of the previous table entry, let DOE overwrite it with the
> header of the next entry and restore it afterwards.
> 
> The resulting CDAT is preceded by 4 unavoidable useless bytes.  Increase
> the allocation size accordingly and skip these bytes when exposing CDAT
> in sysfs.
> 
> The buffer overflow check in cxl_cdat_read_table() becomes unnecessary
> because the remaining bytes in the allocation are tracked in "length",
> which is passed to DOE and limits how many bytes it writes to the
> allocation.  Additionally, cxl_cdat_read_table() bails out if the DOE
> response is truncated due to insufficient space.
> 
> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
> ---
>  Changes v2 -> v3:
>  * Newly added patch in v3 on popular request (Jonathan)
> 
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h      |  3 ++-
>  drivers/cxl/port.c     |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 1b954783b516..70097cc75302 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
>  			       size_t *length)
>  {
>  	__le32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(0);
> -	__le32 response[32];
> +	__le32 response[2];
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> @@ -495,28 +495,28 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
>  			       struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe,
>  			       struct cxl_cdat *cdat)
>  {
> -	size_t length = cdat->length;
> -	u32 *data = cdat->table;
> +	size_t length = cdat->length + sizeof(u32);
> +	__le32 *data = cdat->table;
>  	int entry_handle = 0;
> +	__le32 saved_dw = 0;
>  
>  	do {
>  		__le32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle);
>  		struct cdat_entry_header *entry;
> -		__le32 response[32];
>  		size_t entry_dw;
>  		int rc;
>  
>  		rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
>  			     CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
>  			     &request, sizeof(request),
> -			     &response, sizeof(response));
> +			     data, length);
>  		if (rc < 0) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
>  			return rc;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* 1 DW Table Access Response Header + CDAT entry */
> -		entry = (struct cdat_entry_header *)(response + 1);
> +		entry = (struct cdat_entry_header *)(data + 1);
>  		if ((entry_handle == 0 &&
>  		     rc != sizeof(u32) + sizeof(struct cdat_header)) ||
>  		    (entry_handle > 0 &&
> @@ -526,21 +526,22 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
>  
>  		/* Get the CXL table access header entry handle */
>  		entry_handle = FIELD_GET(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE,
> -					 le32_to_cpu(response[0]));
> +					 le32_to_cpu(data[0]));
>  		entry_dw = rc / sizeof(u32);
>  		/* Skip Header */
>  		entry_dw -= 1;
> -		entry_dw = min(length / sizeof(u32), entry_dw);
> -		/* Prevent length < 1 DW from causing a buffer overflow */
> -		if (entry_dw) {
> -			memcpy(data, entry, entry_dw * sizeof(u32));
> -			length -= entry_dw * sizeof(u32);
> -			data += entry_dw;
> -		}
> +		/*
> +		 * Table Access Response Header overwrote the last DW of
> +		 * previous entry, so restore that DW
> +		 */
> +		*data = saved_dw;
> +		length -= entry_dw * sizeof(u32);
> +		data += entry_dw;
> +		saved_dw = *data;
>  	} while (entry_handle != CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_LAST_ENTRY);
>  
>  	/* Length in CDAT header may exceed concatenation of CDAT entries */
> -	cdat->length -= length;
> +	cdat->length -= length - sizeof(u32);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	port->cdat.table = devm_kzalloc(dev, cdat_length, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	port->cdat.table = devm_kzalloc(dev, cdat_length + sizeof(u32),
> +					GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!port->cdat.table)
>  		return;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 1b1cf459ac77..78f5cae5134c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -494,7 +494,8 @@ struct cxl_pmem_region {
>   * @component_reg_phys: component register capability base address (optional)
>   * @dead: last ep has been removed, force port re-creation
>   * @depth: How deep this port is relative to the root. depth 0 is the root.
> - * @cdat: Cached CDAT data
> + * @cdat: Cached CDAT data (@table is preceded by 4 null bytes, these are not
> + *	  included in @length)
>   * @cdat_available: Should a CDAT attribute be available in sysfs
>   */
>  struct cxl_port {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/port.c b/drivers/cxl/port.c
> index 5453771bf330..0705343ac5ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/port.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static ssize_t CDAT_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return memory_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &offset,
> -				       port->cdat.table,
> +				       port->cdat.table + sizeof(u32),
>  				       port->cdat.length);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 20:25 [PATCH v3 00/16] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] cxl/pci: Fix CDAT retrieval on big endian Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:22   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-19 13:03     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-14 13:51     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 15:45       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-28  2:53   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  8:24     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28 12:08       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT header Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:40   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11  9:34     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  1:41   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT entries Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:50   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11 10:56     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/pci: Handle excessive CDAT length Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  1:04   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-14 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 10:26     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-17 10:01       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  1:06   ` Dan Williams
2023-03-01  1:51   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  1:45   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28 18:58   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  1:48   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] PCI/DOE: Deduplicate mailbox flushing Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  5:07   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  5:17   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  2:07   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28  1:18   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  1:39     ` Dan Williams
2023-02-28  5:43     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28  7:24       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 10:42         ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-02 20:22         ` Lukas Wunner
2023-03-07  1:55           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-04-03  0:55           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  2:13   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  5:05   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-15 11:49     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] cxl/pci: Rightsize CDAT response allocation Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 13:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16  0:56   ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2023-02-16  8:03     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28  1:45   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  5:55     ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63ed7f50ed22b_19cbb72946d@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).