linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	wim@djo.tudelft.nl, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com
Subject: Re: 4.7 regression: ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:14:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <677698369b23f5a6bcf3a66fed78802f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201609300844.24325.linux@rainbow-software.org>

On 2016-09-30 02:44, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2016, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 9/29/2016 2:00 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>> >> The previous two patches were in the right direction.
>> >>
>> >> > Can we also get the same output from 4.6 kernel with the attached
>> >> > patch for the same machine you sent these?
>> >
>> > Here it is.
>> >
>> >> > Something about SCI still doesn't feel right.
>> >> >
>> >> > The IRQ assignment fails if the penalty is greater than
>> >> > PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS. This will happen if BIOS tells us to use an
>> >> > IRQ and same IRQ is in use by the SCI.
>> 
>> Thanks, I reverted penalize_sci function and dropped patch #1. Can you 
>> try
>> this again?
> 
> It seems to work, at least on one machine.

Ok, that comfirms my suspicion. We are  having trouble detecting sci 
interrupt  type and we end up penalizing the wrong value.

Can you try your other machines too?

I need to do some research now.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-30 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201609251512.05657.linux@rainbow-software.org>
     [not found] ` <2652205.dsh4NuQbCm@vostro.rjw.lan>
     [not found]   ` <201609272302.23765.linux@rainbow-software.org>
2016-09-27 21:32     ` 4.7 regression: ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-27 22:23       ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-27 22:58         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-27 23:06           ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-28  8:32             ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-28 14:11               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-28 17:02                 ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-28 18:22                   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-28 19:23                     ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-28 23:38                       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-29  9:10                         ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-29 13:09                           ` okaya
2016-09-29 13:49                             ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-29 14:28                               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-29 14:35                                 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-29 16:48                                 ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-29 17:18                                   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-29 18:00                                     ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-29 22:39                                       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-30  6:44                                         ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-30 13:14                                           ` okaya [this message]
2016-09-30 15:56                                             ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-30 19:30                                               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-30 19:39                                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-30 20:24                                                   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-30 21:04                                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-30 21:14                                                       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-09-30 21:27                                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-30 21:33                                                           ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-01 17:49                                                           ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-02 16:53                                                             ` Ondrej Zary
2016-10-03  1:05                                                               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-03  7:25                                                                 ` Ondrej Zary
2016-10-04 14:30                                                                   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-04 17:54                                                             ` Ondrej Zary
2016-09-29 14:18                         ` Wim Osterholt
2016-09-29 14:31                           ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=677698369b23f5a6bcf3a66fed78802f@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    --cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).