linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, aik@amd.com,
	lukas@wunner.de, "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
	"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] PCI: Add PCIe Device 3 Extended Capability enumeration
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 17:05:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <689690d2a07b4_cff991006c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250807220656.GA64413@bhelgaas>

Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > PCIe 6.2 Section 7.7.9 Device 3 Extended Capability Structure,
> > enumerates new link capabilities and status added for Gen 6 devices. One
> 
> s/ added for Gen 6 devices//
> 
> I know the "Gen 6 device" terminology is pervasive, but the spec
> suggests avoiding it because it's so ambiguous.

Ok.

> 
> > of the link details enumerated in that register block is the "Segment
> > Captured" status in the Device Status 3 register. That status is
> > relevant for enabling IDE (Integrity & Data Encryption) whereby
> > Selective IDE streams can be limited to a given Requester ID range
> > within a given segment.
> > 
> > If a device has captured its Segment value then it knows that PCIe Flit
> > Mode is enabled via all links in the path that a configuration write
> > traversed. IDE establishment requires that "Segment Base" in
> > IDE RID Association Register 2 (PCIe 6.2 Section 7.9.26.5.4.2) be
> > programmed if the RID association mechanism is in effect.
> > 
> > When / if IDE + Flit Mode capable devices arrive, the PCI core needs to
> > setup the segment base when using the RID association facility, but no
> > known deployments today depend on this.
> 
> So far this mentions a lot of facts, but only the subject hints at
> what it does.  I guess it just captures the Flit Mode status, inferred
> by Segment Captured?
> 
> I'm OK with basically just saying *that*, and moving some of the
> implications to places where we depend on them.

Agree, too wordy. Trimmed to:

PCIe r7.0 Section 7.7.9 Device 3 Extended Capability Structure, defines the
canonical location for determining the Flit Mode of a device. This status
is a dependency for PCIe IDE enabling. Add a new fm_enabled flag to 'struct
pci_dev'.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-09  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17 18:33 [PATCH v4 00/10] PCI/TSM: Core infrastructure for PCI device security (TDISP) Dan Williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] coco/tsm: Introduce a core device for TEE Security Managers Dan Williams
2025-07-29 11:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI/IDE: Enumerate Selective Stream IDE capabilities Dan Williams
2025-07-29 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 20:59     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 20:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 22:37     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:53       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08  2:17         ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-08 15:59           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 22:43   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Introduce pci_walk_bus_reverse(), for_each_pci_dev_reverse() Dan Williams
2025-07-29 13:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 23:52     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 10:54       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 20:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-07 23:17     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 23:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI/TSM: Authenticate devices via platform TSM Dan Williams
2025-07-29 14:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06  1:35     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 11:10       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 23:16         ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 10:42           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07  2:35         ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-05 15:53   ` Xu Yilun
2025-08-06 22:30     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 21:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 22:51     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-13  2:57   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-14  1:40     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-14 14:52       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-18 21:08         ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] samples/devsec: Introduce a PCI device-security bus + endpoint sample Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06  3:20     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 11:16       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 18:33         ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-11 13:18           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2025-08-11 20:47             ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 21:45   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 23:45     ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] PCI: Add PCIe Device 3 Extended Capability enumeration Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:00     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-06 21:02     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-09  0:05     ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-08-07 22:46   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] PCI/IDE: Add IDE establishment helpers Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:40     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-09  1:52     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:47   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-08 10:21   ` Arto Merilainen
2025-08-08 17:26     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-11  8:02       ` Arto Merilainen
2025-08-28  8:19         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] PCI/IDE: Report available IDE streams Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 22:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] PCI/TSM: Report active " Dan Williams
2025-07-29 15:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 21:55     ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-07 22:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-17 18:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] samples/devsec: Add sample IDE establishment Dan Williams
2025-07-29 16:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-18 10:57 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] PCI/TSM: Core infrastructure for PCI device security (TDISP) Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=689690d2a07b4_cff991006c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).