From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:27:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6914fbb5a6ce_1d911001b@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5068916.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 12, 2025 7:39:41 AM CET Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > On Nov 07, 2025 at 19:35:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > The runtime PM usage counter guards introduced recently:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6196611.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki/
> > >
> > > and then fixed:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5943878.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki/
> > >
> > > should generally work, but using them feels sort of arcane and cryptic
> > > even though the underlying concept is relatively straightforward.
> > >
> > > For this reason, runtime PM wrapper macros around ACQUIRE() and
> > > ACQUIRE_ERR() involving the new guards are introduced in this series
> > > (patch [1/3]) and then used in the code already using the guards (patches
> > > [2/3] and [3/3]) to make it look more straightforward.
> >
> > The patches look okay to me,
> > Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
>
> Thank you and Jonathan for the tags, but since Frank is not convinced, let me
> bounce one more idea off all of you.
>
> Namely, I think that Frank has a point when he wonders if PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR
> hides too much information and I agree with Jonathan that may be misunderstood,
> so what about defining the wrapper macros so they don't hide the guard variable
> name, like in the patch below?
I had been reluctant about offering an enthusiastic tag on this series
given that information hiding, but with this change:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
However, I prefer that the scope variable declaration vs usage
(reference) cases should maintain visual separation with an operator,
i.e.:
PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
return -ENXIO;
Otherwise we have a case of different flavors of *_ACQUIRE_ERR
implementing various styles. I initially looked at hiding the '&':
http://lore.kernel.org/681ea7d5ea04b_2a2bb100cf@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch
...but it grew on me precisely because it provides a clue about how this
magic operates.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 18:35 [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-07 18:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for ACQUIRE()/ACQUIRE_ERR() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-10 16:06 ` Frank Li
2025-11-07 18:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] PCI/sysfs: Use PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE()/PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-07 18:41 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI: TAD: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-10 12:06 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: runtime: Wrapper macros for usage counter guards Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 6:39 ` Dhruva Gole
2025-11-12 19:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-12 21:27 ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-11-12 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 11:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-13 11:35 ` Dhruva Gole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6914fbb5a6ce_1d911001b@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=zhangqilong3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).