Re: [PATCH] PCI: pcie-rcar: Cache PHY init function pointer

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 4/28/20 10:32 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:31:47PM +0200, marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>
>> The PHY initialization function pointer does not change during the
>> lifetime of the driver instance, it is therefore sufficient to get
>> the pointer in .probe(), cache it in driver private data, and just
>> call the function through the cached pointer in .resume().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> NOTE: Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git
>>       branch pci/rcar
>> NOTE: The driver tag is now 'pcie-rcar' to distinguish it from pci-rcar-gen2.c
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Squashed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11438665

Thanks

> Do you want me to rename the $SUBJECT (and the branch name while at it)
> in the patches in my pci/rcar branch ("PCI: pcie-rcar: ...") to start
> the commit subject tag renaming from this cycle (and in the interim you
> send a rename for the drivers files ?)

I don't really have a particular preference either way. I can keep
marking the drivers with pcie-rcar and pci-rcar tags if that helps
discern them.