From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115461E0B9C; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740924822; cv=none; b=RLGJdcKEnSaZtONC0oRCPE+T2a72xXVJz5FxfZOGQHzPYZO3X7qdP1y9cMMlFIYB6fJu3OwtiptY0HL6U2T4ISOjhOq3jg5dz5EDV+MvzGwWrpWz9L9i6xcgRr8L5OKiwXv2Jyvpb//+xc8Rjr5j1/KXbDXWUI1qs/DrP5D0htQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740924822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c9aOMXbCuUn+01PgPzDWGcg8tOpN18R3trxMFhnD7Ds=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oRw6fZPYRQS0YJy+EmjuT1vQzqfFPF54b1/161g3C4RhHOmVGIIz+J5skzDnfwAlsrmb0YjIubP9uzaZ/mqHDfA3Lz9Cduc6lHuiDDgRMEJ2u71FLkCIJSh4hC2srZp4Qwf9gnmek5dJCIV76Lu3kbe4X6Pb2Qi6r8Pxj+zft5M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=nMesIqqY; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=JAB/I43s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="nMesIqqY"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="JAB/I43s" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1740924818; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HZslAGJtwANGdTqRhXjL6ifh1nXzfpEo8UaYcz63Pc0=; b=nMesIqqYZqv0A8TNSYSwzm3QCVzET60clWQ8n9zP9wuGfIZAA57af7C2zINkR8kbr4G776 OhInp+DcAnu3ude1gV/Bo6Q1JBWtNBQDc0zLIg+6CP4LXVP9nQGnzgJWjW4qlFyPppb1+C /CNVjUl5aFrXE4byqLVZwLmjEca9mg3M8GRvKajqqlkP18uwNeJZwuB8rTMB0t1/IlPJLo UhzGKQ+qt+jFvv0MXvZD+/SEZoW+cYvjlBbDRF1ozHwJqSgULe7RbaWPRfZqQwx3F+67Gj SbdhW0xfuylMofEhHlJQO5jcG1hY6A6Aw6FdrU49obKQLf3TiTWePuk1xQ3jOQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1740924818; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HZslAGJtwANGdTqRhXjL6ifh1nXzfpEo8UaYcz63Pc0=; b=JAB/I43sCER7KQeHJw6I9n6JBtlAg4G7icXmy5ZPuUMVbSjB5lm9ZqLeT1XATxfLxofy9d AksPKzXhYG8c2gAA== To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, kw@linux.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com, cassel@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [v3] genirq/msi: Add the address and data that show MSI/MSIX In-Reply-To: <20250302020328.296523-1-18255117159@163.com> References: <20250302020328.296523-1-18255117159@163.com> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 15:13:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87ldtncyge.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Mar 02 2025 at 10:03, Hans Zhang wrote: Previous comments still apply. > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503020812.PKZf7JBa-lkp@intel.com/ > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503020807.c3MhmbJh-lkp@intel.com/ That's wrong. You are not submitting this patch as a response to a report from the test robot. Reported/Closes makes only sense for a patch which fixes something existing, but not for a new feature or functionality. Thanks, tglx