linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI: add support for Immediate Readiness
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 09:02:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvn3w4bz.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905164909.GJ107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>


Hi,

Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> writes:
>> >> I think the patch is touching the wrong places. pci_dev_wait() is there
>> >> to wait for CRS response to finish following reset.
>> >> 
>> >> Typical sequences are:
>> >> 1. Do some kind of reset in another routine
>> >> 2. Wait reset specific wait time (1sec for secondary bus reset as an
>> >> example and 100ms for d3-d0 transition)
>> >> 3. call pci_dev_wait() after reset to see if device can accept config
>> >> transactions.
>> >> 
>> >> Since this applies to all resets, I think you also need to get rid of
>> >> waits following different reset types in step #2 and return immediately.
>> >> I suggest you review callers of pci_dev_wait() and tap in there.
>> >
>> > I agree; I think we should be able to skip the delays in pcie_flr(),
>> > pci_af_flr(), etc.
>> 
>> but that's why I put the code in pci_dev_wait(). Both pcie_flr() and
>> pci_af_flr() call pci_dev_wait(); or are you saying that the msleep(100)
>> call in pci_af_flr() can also be removed if (dev->imm_ready)?
>
> Yes.  The spec says (PCIe r4.0, sec 7.5.1.1.4):
>
>   When this bit is Set, for accesses to this Function, software is
>   exempt from all requirements to delay configuration accesses
>   following any type of reset, including but not limited to the timing
>   requirements defined in Section 6.6.
>
> Sec 6.6 contains various references to waiting 100ms after different
> types of resets, and I think those correspond to the msleep(100)
> calls.  So I think we can skip those delays if the device supports
> Immediate Readiness.
>
> pci_dev_wait() is connected with CRS.  There's some reason that
> function doesn't actually looks for CRS responses, which I can't
> remember right now.  But you can look it up in the changelogs.
>
> So I don't think we should put the Immediate Readiness check in
> pci_dev_wait().

IOW, you want something like below? If that's the case, I can send
another version shortly.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 29ff9619b5fa..61be196db92b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static void __pci_start_power_transition(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
 		 * because have already delayed for the bridge.
 		 */
 		if (dev->runtime_d3cold) {
-			if (dev->d3cold_delay)
+			if (dev->d3cold_delay && !dev->imm_ready)
 				msleep(dev->d3cold_delay);
 			/*
 			 * When powering on a bridge from D3cold, the
@@ -2644,6 +2644,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_d3cold_disable);
 void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	int pm;
+	u16 status;
 	u16 pmc;
 
 	pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev);
@@ -2706,6 +2707,9 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		/* Disable the PME# generation functionality */
 		pci_pme_active(dev, false);
 	}
+
+	pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_STATUS, &status);
+	dev->imm_ready = status & PCI_STATUS_IMMEDIATE;
 }
 
 static unsigned long pci_ea_flags(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 prop)
@@ -4376,6 +4380,9 @@ int pcie_flr(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR);
 
+	if (dev->imm_ready)
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Per PCIe r4.0, sec 6.6.2, a device must complete an FLR within
 	 * 100ms, but may silently discard requests while the FLR is in
@@ -4417,6 +4424,9 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
 
 	pci_write_config_byte(dev, pos + PCI_AF_CTRL, PCI_AF_CTRL_FLR);
 
+	if (dev->imm_ready)
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Per Advanced Capabilities for Conventional PCI ECN, 13 April 2006,
 	 * updated 27 July 2006; a device must complete an FLR within
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index e72ca8dd6241..7eed464e844a 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
 	pci_power_t	current_state;	/* Current operating state. In ACPI,
 					   this is D0-D3, D0 being fully
 					   functional, and D3 being off. */
+	unsigned int	imm_ready:1;	/* Supports Immediate Readiness */
 	u8		pm_cap;		/* PM capability offset */
 	unsigned int	pme_support:5;	/* Bitmask of states from which PME#
 					   can be generated */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
index ee556ccc93f4..b5cf51a06cae 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
 #define  PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE 0x400 /* INTx Emulation Disable */
 
 #define PCI_STATUS		0x06	/* 16 bits */
+#define  PCI_STATUS_IMMEDIATE	0x01	/* Immediate Readiness */
 #define  PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT	0x08	/* Interrupt status */
 #define  PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST	0x10	/* Support Capability List */
 #define  PCI_STATUS_66MHZ	0x20	/* Support 66 MHz PCI 2.1 bus */


-- 
balbi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-02 11:36 [RFC] PCI: add support for Immediate Readiness Felipe Balbi
2018-08-02 11:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-02 12:11   ` Felipe Balbi
2018-08-03  6:14 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-03  6:26   ` Felipe Balbi
2018-08-03 17:25     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-04 18:11       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-05  5:18         ` Felipe Balbi
2018-09-05  5:23           ` Felipe Balbi
2018-09-05  5:29             ` Felipe Balbi
2018-09-05 16:49           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-05 16:54             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-06  6:02             ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2018-09-06 14:13               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-07  6:16                 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-09-20  6:12                   ` Felipe Balbi
2018-09-28 17:57                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-01  5:42                     ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tvn3w4bz.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).