Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	<kw@linux.com>, <robh@kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>, <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <cassel@kernel.org>,
	<dlemoal@kernel.org>, <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <srk@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:41:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b56604d-a2b8-4227-8a6f-c477332416b4@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513215350.GA1996021@bhelgaas>

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 04:53:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > In the process of converting .scan_bus() callbacks to .add_bus(), the
> > ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() function was changed to ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus().
> > The .scan_bus() method belonged to ks_pcie_host_ops which was specific
> > to controller version 3.65a, while the .add_bus() method had been added
> > to ks_pcie_ops which is shared between the controller versions 3.65a and
> > 4.90a. Neither the older ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() method, nor the newer
> > ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() method is applicable to the controller version
> > 4.90a which is present in AM654x SoCs.
> > 
> > Thus, as a fix, remove "ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus()" and move its contents
> > to the .msi_init callback "ks_pcie_msi_host_init()" which is specific to
> > the 3.65a controller.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6ab15b5e7057 ("PCI: dwc: keystone: Convert .scan_bus() callback to use add_bus")
> > Suggested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
> 
> Thanks for splitting this into two patches.  Krzysztof has applied
> both to pci/controller/keystone and we hope to merge them for v6.10.
> 
> I *would* like the commit log to be at a little higher level if
> possible.  Right now it's a detailed description at the level of the
> code edits, but it doesn't say *why* we want this change.
> 
> I think the first cut at this was
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20231011123451.34827-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/t/#u,
> which mentioned Completion Timeouts during MSI-X configuration and 45
> second delays during boot.
> 
> IIUC, prior to 6ab15b5e7057, ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() initialized BAR
> 0 and was only used for v3.65a devices.  6ab15b5e7057 renamed it to
> ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() and called it for both v3.65a and v4.90a.
> 
> I think the problem is that in the current code, the
> ks_pcie_ops.add_bus() method (ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus()) is used for all
> devices (both v3.65a and v4.90a).  So I guess doing the BAR 0 setup on
> v4.90a broke something there?

BAR0 was set to a different value on AM654x SoC which has the v4.90a
controller, which is identical to what is set even for the v3.65a
controller. The difference is that BAR0 is programmed to a different
value for enabling inbound MSI writes on top of the common configuration
performed for BAR0.

Common configuration for BAR0:
ks_pcie_probe
  dw_pcie_host_init
    dw_pcie_setup_rc
    ...
     /* Setup RC BARs */
     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 0x00000004);
     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1, 0x00000000);
     ...
     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 0);
    ...

MSI specific configuration of BAR0 performed after the common
configuration via the ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() callback:
	/* Configure and set up BAR0 */
	ks_pcie_set_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);

	/* Enable BAR0 */
	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 1);
	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, SZ_4K - 1);

	ks_pcie_clear_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);

	 /*
	  * For BAR0, just setting bus address for inbound writes (MSI) should
	  * be sufficient.  Use physical address to avoid any conflicts.
	  */
	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, ks_pcie->app.start);

The above configuration of BAR0 shouldn't be performed for AM654x SoC.
While I am not certain, the timeouts are probably a result of the BAR
being programmed to a wrong value which results in a "no match" outcome.

> 
> I'm not quite clear on the mechanism, but it would be helpful to at
> least know what's wrong and on what platform.  E.g., currently v4.90
> suffers Completion Timeouts and 45 second boot delays?  And this patch
> fixes that?

Yes, the Completion Timeouts cause the 45 second boot delays and this
patch fixes that.

Regards,
Siddharth.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28  8:50 [PATCH v7 0/2] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-03-28  8:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: keystone: Relocate ks_pcie_set/clear_dbi_mode() Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-03-28  8:50 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-05-13 21:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-14 12:11     ` Siddharth Vadapalli [this message]
2024-05-14 21:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-15 19:26         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-16  5:37           ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-05-16 14:17             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-05-17 11:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] " Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b56604d-a2b8-4227-8a6f-c477332416b4@ti.com \
    --to=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=srk@ti.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox