From: Ricky WU <ricky_wu@realtek.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: "scott@spiteful.org" <scott@spiteful.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [bug report] nvme not re-recognize when changed M.2 SSD in S3 mode
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:02:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c3d00850e7449c184e4c45a3c9b9dfa@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhapFF3393xuIHwM@wunner.de>
Hi Lukas,
I tested this patch and the result looks good, but if the two SSD has same VID, PID and capacity it still has problem.
So I think add S/N to compare is necessary if it can do
And I also tested SD7.0 card the result is same with M.2 SSD
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> > @@ -152,6 +152,25 @@ static int get_adapter_status(struct hotplug_slot
> *hotplug_slot, u8 *value)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool pciehp_device_replaced(struct controller *ctrl) {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
>
> I've realized this needs to be
>
> + struct pci_dev *pdev __free(pci_dev_put);
>
> to avoid leaking a ref on the child device. For testing purposes, the patch
> should still be fine without this change, but I'll have to fix this up if/when
> submitting a proper patch.
>
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + pdev = pci_get_slot(ctrl->pcie->port->subordinate, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
> > + if (!pdev)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (!pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(ctrl->pcie->port->subordinate,
> > + PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), ®, 0))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (reg != (pdev->vendor | (pdev->device << 16)))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * pciehp_check_presence() - synthesize event if presence has changed
> > * @ctrl: controller to check
> > @@ -172,7 +191,8 @@ static void pciehp_check_presence(struct
> > controller *ctrl)
> >
> > occupied = pciehp_card_present_or_link_active(ctrl);
> > if ((occupied > 0 && (ctrl->state == OFF_STATE ||
> > - ctrl->state == BLINKINGON_STATE)) ||
> > + ctrl->state == BLINKINGON_STATE ||
> > + pciehp_device_replaced(ctrl))) ||
> > (!occupied && (ctrl->state == ON_STATE ||
> > ctrl->state == BLINKINGOFF_STATE)))
> > pciehp_request(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 5:44 [bug report] nvme not re-recognize when changed M.2 SSD in S3 mode Ricky WU
2024-04-09 13:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-10 10:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-10 14:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-25 6:02 ` Ricky WU [this message]
2024-05-27 11:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-29 7:47 ` Ricky WU
2024-05-29 14:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-15 7:31 ` Ricky WU
2024-05-15 8:46 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c3d00850e7449c184e4c45a3c9b9dfa@realtek.com \
--to=ricky_wu@realtek.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=scott@spiteful.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox